Theta Series and Even Unimodular Lattices

Author(s):  
Gaëtan Chenevier ◽  
Jean Lannes
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Bart Michels

Abstract Given a closed geodesic on a compact arithmetic hyperbolic surface, we show the existence of a sequence of Laplacian eigenfunctions whose integrals along the geodesic exhibit nontrivial growth. Via Waldspurger’s formula we deduce a lower bound for central values of Rankin-Selberg L-functions of Maass forms times theta series associated to real quadratic fields.


Author(s):  
Adrian Barquero-Sanchez ◽  
Guillermo Mantilla-Soler ◽  
Nathan C. Ryan
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-245
Author(s):  
Y.Z. Flicker ◽  
J.G.M. Mars

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (06) ◽  
pp. 1485-1499
Author(s):  
Takeshi Ogasawara

We prove that the dimension of the Hecke module generated by a certain eta-quotient is equal to the class number of an imaginary quadratic field. To do this, we relate the eta-quotient to the Hecke theta series attached to a ray class character of the imaginary quadratic field.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoyu Nagaoka ◽  
Sho Takemori
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 571-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Funke ◽  
John Millson

AbstractIn our previous paper [J. Funke and J. Millson, Cycles with local coefficients for orthogonal groups and vector-valued Siegel modular forms, American J. Math. 128 (2006), 899–948], we established a correspondence between vector-valued holomorphic Siegel modular forms and cohomology with local coefficients for local symmetric spaces $X$ attached to real orthogonal groups of type $(p, q)$. This correspondence is realized using theta functions associated with explicitly constructed ‘special’ Schwartz forms. Furthermore, the theta functions give rise to generating series of certain ‘special cycles’ in $X$ with coefficients.In this paper, we study the boundary behaviour of these theta functions in the non-compact case and show that the theta functions extend to the Borel–Sere compactification $ \overline{X} $ of $X$. However, for the $ \mathbb{Q} $-split case for signature $(p, p)$, we have to construct and consider a slightly larger compactification, the ‘big’ Borel–Serre compactification. The restriction to each face of $ \overline{X} $ is again a theta series as in [J. Funke and J. Millson, loc. cit.], now for a smaller orthogonal group and a larger coefficient system.As an application we establish in certain cases the cohomological non-vanishing of the special (co)cycles when passing to an appropriate finite cover of $X$. In particular, the (co)homology groups in question do not vanish. We deduce as a consequence a sharp non-vanishing theorem for ${L}^{2} $-cohomology.


2006 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-71
Author(s):  
Christine Bachoc ◽  
Riccardo Salvati Manni
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myung-Hwan Kim

2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae-Yeoul Kim ◽  
Ja-Kyung Koo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document