Lower Bounds on the Size of Quantum Automata Accepting Unary Languages

Author(s):  
Alberto Bertoni ◽  
Carlo Mereghetti ◽  
Beatrice Palano
2014 ◽  
Vol 551 ◽  
pp. 102-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Paola Bianchi ◽  
Carlo Mereghetti ◽  
Beatrice Palano

Author(s):  
Maria Paola Bianchi ◽  
Carlo Mereghetti ◽  
Beatrice Palano

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (07) ◽  
pp. 877-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARTIN KUTRIB ◽  
ANDREAS MALCHER ◽  
MATTHIAS WENDLANDT

We investigate the descriptional complexity of deterministic one-way multi-head finite automata accepting unary languages. It is known that in this case the languages accepted are regular. Thus, we study the increase of the number of states when an n-state k-head finite automaton is simulated by a classical (one-head) deterministic or nondeterministic finite automaton. In the former case upper and lower bounds that are tight in the order of magnitude are shown. For the latter case we obtain an upper bound of O(n2k) and a lower bound of Ω(nk) states. We investigate also the costs for the conversion of one-head nondeterministic finite automata to deterministic k-head finite automata, that is, we trade nondeterminism for heads. In addition, we study how the conversion costs vary in the special case of finite and, in particular, of singleton unary lanuages. Finally, as an application of the simulation results, we show that decidability problems for unary deterministic k-head finite automata such as emptiness or equivalence are LOGSPACE-complete.


2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (04) ◽  
pp. 827-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
CARLO MEREGHETTI

We study lower bounds on space and input head reversals for deterministic, nondeterministic, and alternating Turing machines accepting nonregular languages. Three notions of space, namely strong, middle, weak are considered, and another notion, called accept, is introduced. In all cases, we obtain tight lower bounds. Moreover, we show that, while for determinism and nondeterminism such lower bounds are optimal even with respect to unary languages, for alternation optimal lower bounds for unary languages turn out to be strictly higher than those for languages over alphabets with two or more symbols.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Lee ◽  
A. Shraibman

Author(s):  
Parinya CHALERMSOOK ◽  
Hiroshi IMAI ◽  
Vorapong SUPPAKITPAISARN

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document