Automated Segmentation of the Left Ventricle Including Papillary Muscles in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images

2007 ◽  
pp. 453-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. El Berbari ◽  
I. Bloch ◽  
A. Redheuil ◽  
E. D. Angelini ◽  
E. Mousseaux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Images ◽  
Automated Segmentation ◽  
Papillary Muscles

Morphological three-dimensional analysis of papillary muscles in borderline left ventricles

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1369-1376
Author(s):  
Mari N. Velasco Forte ◽  
Mohamed Nassar ◽  
Nick Byrne ◽  
Miguel Silva Vieira ◽  
Israel V. Pérez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Papillary Muscle ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Papillary Muscles ◽  
Biventricular Repair ◽  
Muscle Morphology ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Surgical Options

AbstractObjectiveMitral valve anatomy has a significant impact on potential surgical options for patients with hypoplastic or borderline left ventricle. Papillary muscle morphology is a major component regarding this aspect. The purpose of this study was to use cardiac magnetic resonance to describe the differences in papillary muscle anatomy between normal, borderline, and hypoplastic left ventricles.MethodsWe carried out a retrospective, observational cardiac magnetic resonance study of children (median age 5.36 years) with normal (n=30), borderline (n=22), or hypoplastic (n=13) left ventricles. Borderline and hypoplastic cases had undergone an initial hybrid procedure. Morphological features of the papillary muscles, location, and arrangement were analysed and compared across groups.ResultsAll normal ventricles had two papillary muscles with narrow pedicles; however, 18% of borderline and 46% of hypoplastic cases had a single papillary muscle, usually the inferomedial type. In addition, in borderline or hypoplastic ventricles, the supporting pedicle occasionally displayed a wide insertion along the ventricular wall. The length ratio of the superolateral support was significantly different between groups (normal: 0.46±0.08; borderline: 0.39±0.07; hypoplastic: 0.36±0.1; p=0.009). No significant difference, however, was found when analysing the inferomedial type (0.42±0.09; 0.38±0.07; 0.39±0.22, p=0.39). The angle subtended between supports was also similar among groups (113°±17°; 111°±51° and 114°±57°; p=0.99). A total of eight children with borderline left ventricle underwent biventricular repair. There were no significant differentiating features for papillary muscle morphology in this subgroup.ConclusionsThe superolateral support can be shorter or absent in borderline or hypoplastic left ventricle cases. The papillary muscle pedicles in these patients often show a broad insertion. These changes have important implications on surgical options and should be described routinely.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document