A Self-stabilizing $\frac{2}{3}$ -Approximation Algorithm for the Maximum Matching Problem

Author(s):  
Fredrik Manne ◽  
Morten Mjelde ◽  
Laurence Pilard ◽  
Sébastien Tixeuil
2011 ◽  
Vol 412 (40) ◽  
pp. 5515-5526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredrik Manne ◽  
Morten Mjelde ◽  
Laurence Pilard ◽  
Sébastien Tixeuil

Algorithmica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 1057-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayan Bhattacharya ◽  
Deeparnab Chakrabarty ◽  
Monika Henzinger

Abstract We consider the problems of maintaining an approximate maximum matching and an approximate minimum vertex cover in a dynamic graph undergoing a sequence of edge insertions/deletions. Starting with the seminal work of Onak and Rubinfeld (in: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on theory of computing (STOC), 2010), this problem has received significant attention in recent years. Very recently, extending the framework of Baswana et al. (in: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science (FOCS), 2011) , Solomon (in: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science (FOCS), 2016) gave a randomized dynamic algorithm for this problem that has an approximation ratio of 2 and an amortized update time of O(1) with high probability. This algorithm requires the assumption of an oblivious adversary, meaning that the future sequence of edge insertions/deletions in the graph cannot depend in any way on the algorithm’s past output. A natural way to remove the assumption on oblivious adversary is to give a deterministic dynamic algorithm for the same problem in O(1) update time. In this paper, we resolve this question. We present a new deterministic fully dynamic algorithm that maintains a O(1)-approximate minimum vertex cover and maximum fractional matching, with an amortized update time of O(1). Previously, the best deterministic algorithm for this problem was due to Bhattacharya et al. (in: Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms (SODA), 2015); it had an approximation ratio of $$(2+\varepsilon )$$(2+ε) and an amortized update time of $$O(\log n/\varepsilon ^2)$$O(logn/ε2). Our result can be generalized to give a fully dynamic $$O(f^3)$$O(f3)-approximate algorithm with $$O(f^2)$$O(f2) amortized update time for the hypergraph vertex cover and fractional hypergraph matching problem, where every hyperedge has at most f vertices.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Yang ◽  
Zhixiang Yin ◽  
Kaifeng Huang ◽  
Jianzhong Cui

Author(s):  
Li Yu-Tong ◽  
Wang Yuxin

Due to a lack of essential knowledge to support functional reasoning from the design requirements of the kinematic compound mechanisms to their constituent mechanisms, the creative conceptual design of kinematic compound mechanisms based on functional synthesis approach is still a challenging task. Through introducing the dynamic partition-matching process between the function layer and the form layer to substitute for the direct function-structure matching in the FBS model, the function-structure matching problem corresponding to deficient functional reasoning knowledge for kinematic compound mechanisms is solved by the authors. The following challenge is how to cluster the divided subset of basic operation actions generated in the form layer during the partition-matching process into a well-organized and complete kinematic behavior that can be matched by the sub-function in the function layer and implemented by a structure in the database. The adopted strategies in this paper are: through defining the correlation indexes between basic operation actions, the basic operation action and its realized function behavior, and its embodied structure, as well as its dynamic behavior characteristics, the clustering possibility for a group of basic operation actions is determined. With the aid of the compatibility conditions between basic operation actions in the form layer and the consistency of the order relations between basic operation actions in the function layer and the form layer respectively, the consistency of the order relations among basic operation actions between the sub-functions in the function layer and the sub-behaviors in the form layer are guaranteed. Then, the optimal matching structures corresponding to the sub-functions in the function layer are determined based on the maximum matching coefficients of basic operation actions. In this way, the subsets of basic operation actions in the form layer are clustered into a number of complete behaviors that can be realized by mechanisms in the structure database and matched by the sub-functions in the function layer. Since multiple functional behaviors of each constituent basic mechanism take part in matching, some novel schemes of compound mechanisms with fewer and simpler constituent mechanisms to implement the overall function may be dug out.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document