Engaging the Dynamics of Trust in Computational Trust and Reputation Systems

2010 ◽  
pp. 22-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Danek ◽  
Joana Urbano ◽  
Ana Paula Rocha ◽  
Eugénio Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Reputation Systems ◽  
Computational Trust ◽  
Trust And Reputation

Review on Computational Trust and Reputation Models

2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi Sabater ◽  
Carles Sierra
Keyword(s):  
Computational Trust ◽  
Trust And Reputation

Survey on Computational Trust and Reputation Models

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego De Siqueira Braga ◽  
Marco Niemann ◽  
Bernd Hellingrath ◽  
Fernando Buarque De Lima Neto
Keyword(s):  
Computational Trust ◽  
Trust And Reputation

scholarly journals Modeling and verification of trust and reputation systems

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (16) ◽  
pp. 2933-2946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Aldini
Keyword(s):  
Reputation Systems ◽  
Trust And Reputation

A Taxonomy to Express Open Challenges in Trust and Reputation Systems

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mozhgan Tavakolifard ◽  
Kevin C. Almeroth
Keyword(s):  
Reputation Systems ◽  
Trust And Reputation

scholarly journals On the ethical and political agency of online reputation systems

First Monday ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Wilson ◽  
Stefano De Paoli
Keyword(s):  
Methodological Individualism ◽  
Digital Data ◽  
Reputation Systems ◽  
Political Agency ◽  
Main Approach ◽  
Trust And Reputation ◽  
Alternative Approaches ◽  
Online Reputation ◽  
Digital Spaces

Social and socioeconomic interactions and transactions often require trust. In digital spaces, the main approach to facilitating trust has effectively been to try to reduce or even remove the need for it through the implementation of reputation systems. These generate metrics based on digital data such as ratings and reviews submitted by users, interaction histories, and so on, that are intended to label individuals as more or less reliable or trustworthy in a particular interaction context. We undertake a disclosive archaeology (Introna, 2014) of typical reputation systems, identifying relevant figuration agencies including affordances and prohibitions, (cyborg) identities, (cyborg) practices and discourses, in order to examine their ethico-political agency. We suggest that conventional approaches to the design of such systems are rooted in a capitalist, competitive paradigm, relying on methodological individualism, and that the reputation technologies themselves thus embody and enact this paradigm within whatever space they operate. We question whether the politics, ethics and philosophy that contribute to this paradigm align with those of some of the contexts in which reputation systems are now being used, and suggest that alternative approaches to the establishment of trust and reputation in digital spaces need to be considered for alternative contexts.

Model checking of robustness properties in trust and reputation systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 302-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Asgary Ghasempouri ◽  
Behrouz Tork Ladani
Keyword(s):  
Model Checking ◽  
Reputation Systems ◽  
Trust And Reputation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document