scholarly journals A Quasipolynomial Cut-Elimination Procedure in Deep Inference via Atomic Flows and Threshold Formulae

Author(s):  
Paola Bruscoli ◽  
Alessio Guglielmi ◽  
Tom Gundersen ◽  
Michel Parigot
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 1277-1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
René David ◽  
Karim Nour

AbstractWe give a direct, purely arithmetical and elementary proof of the strong normalization of the cut-elimination procedure for full (i.e., in presence of all the usual connectives) classical natural deduction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 614-650
Author(s):  
TAUS BROCK-NANNESTAD ◽  
NICOLAS GUENOT

We investigate cut elimination in multi-focused sequent calculi and the impact on the cut elimination proof of design choices in such calculi. The particular design we advocate is illustrated by a multi-focused calculus for full linear logic using an explicitly polarised syntax and incremental focus handling, for which we provide a syntactic cut elimination procedure. We discuss the effect of cut elimination on the structure of proofs, leading to a conceptually simple proof exploiting the strong structure of multi-focused proofs.


2021 ◽  
pp. 281-298
Author(s):  
Caitlin D’Abrera ◽  
Jeremy Dawson ◽  
Rajeev Goré

Author(s):  
Masahiro Hamano

Abstract We construct a geometry of interaction (GoI: dynamic modelling of Gentzen-style cut elimination) for multiplicative-additive linear logic (MALL) by employing Bucciarelli–Ehrhard indexed linear logic MALL(I) to handle the additives. Our construction is an extension to the additives of the Haghverdi–Scott categorical formulation (a multiplicative GoI situation in a traced monoidal category) for Girard’s original GoI 1. The indices are shown to serve not only in their original denotational level, but also at a finer grained dynamic level so that the peculiarities of additive cut elimination such as superposition, erasure of subproofs, and additive (co-) contraction can be handled with the explicit use of indices. Proofs are interpreted as indexed subsets in the category Rel, but without the explicit relational composition; instead, execution formulas are run pointwise on the interpretation at each index, with respect to symmetries of cuts, in a traced monoidal category with a reflexive object and a zero morphism. The sets of indices diminish overall when an execution formula is run, corresponding to the additive cut-elimination procedure (erasure), and allowing recovery of the relational composition. The main theorem is the invariance of the execution formulas along cut elimination so that the formulas converge to the denotations of (cut-free) proofs.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Strassburger

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document