A Formally Verified Cut-Elimination Procedure for Linear Nested Sequents for Tense Logic

2021 ◽  
pp. 281-298
Author(s):  
Caitlin D’Abrera ◽  
Jeremy Dawson ◽  
Rajeev Goré
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 1277-1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
René David ◽  
Karim Nour

AbstractWe give a direct, purely arithmetical and elementary proof of the strong normalization of the cut-elimination procedure for full (i.e., in presence of all the usual connectives) classical natural deduction.


Author(s):  
Alexander Gheorghiu ◽  
Sonia Marin

AbstractThe logic of Bunched Implications (BI) freely combines additive and multiplicative connectives, including implications; however, despite its well-studied proof theory, proof-search in BI has always been a difficult problem. The focusing principle is a restriction of the proof-search space that can capture various goal-directed proof-search procedures. In this paper we show that focused proof-search is complete for BI by first reformulating the traditional bunched sequent calculus using the simpler data-structure of nested sequents, following with a polarised and focused variant that we show is sound and complete via a cut-elimination argument. This establishes an operational semantics for focused proof-search in the logic of Bunched Implications.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 614-650
Author(s):  
TAUS BROCK-NANNESTAD ◽  
NICOLAS GUENOT

We investigate cut elimination in multi-focused sequent calculi and the impact on the cut elimination proof of design choices in such calculi. The particular design we advocate is illustrated by a multi-focused calculus for full linear logic using an explicitly polarised syntax and incremental focus handling, for which we provide a syntactic cut elimination procedure. We discuss the effect of cut elimination on the structure of proofs, leading to a conceptually simple proof exploiting the strong structure of multi-focused proofs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document