On Antimagic Labeling of Odd Regular Graphs

Author(s):  
Tao-Ming Wang ◽  
Guang-Hui Zhang
2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oudone Phanalasy ◽  
Mirka Miller ◽  
Costas S. Iliopoulos ◽  
Solon P. Pissis ◽  
Elaheh Vaezpour

2015 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feihuang Chang ◽  
Yu-Chang Liang ◽  
Zhishi Pan ◽  
Xuding Zhu

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yi-Wu Chang ◽  
Shan-Pang Liu

An edge labeling of graph G with labels in A is an injection from E G to A , where E G is the edge set of G , and A is a subset of ℝ . A graph G is called ℝ -antimagic if for each subset A of ℝ with A = E G , there is an edge labeling with labels in A such that the sums of the labels assigned to edges incident to distinct vertices are different. The main result of this paper is that the Cartesian products of complete graphs (except K 1 ) and cycles are ℝ -antimagic.


Author(s):  
Oudone Phanalasy ◽  
Mirka Miller ◽  
Leanne Rylands ◽  
Paulette Lieby

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 76-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao-Ming Wang ◽  
Guang-Hui Zhang

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2071
Author(s):  
Rinovia Simanjuntak ◽  
Tamaro Nadeak ◽  
Fuad Yasin ◽  
Kristiana Wijaya ◽  
Nurdin Hinding ◽  
...  

An antimagic labeling of a graph G is a bijection f:E(G)→{1,…,|E(G)|} such that the weights w(x)=∑y∼xf(y) distinguish all vertices. A well-known conjecture of Hartsfield and Ringel (1990) is that every connected graph other than K2 admits an antimagic labeling. For a set of distances D, a D-antimagic labeling of a graph G is a bijection f:V(G)→{1,…,|V(G)|} such that the weightω(x)=∑y∈ND(x)f(y) is distinct for each vertex x, where ND(x)={y∈V(G)|d(x,y)∈D} is the D-neigbourhood set of a vertex x. If ND(x)=r, for every vertex x in G, a graph G is said to be (D,r)-regular. In this paper, we conjecture that a graph admits a D-antimagic labeling if and only if it does not contain two vertices having the same D-neighborhood set. We also provide evidence that the conjecture is true. We present computational results that, for D={1}, all graphs of order up to 8 concur with the conjecture. We prove that the set of (D,r)-regular D-antimagic graphs is closed under union. We provide examples of disjoint union of symmetric (D,r)-regular that are D-antimagic and examples of disjoint union of non-symmetric non-(D,r)-regular graphs that are D-antimagic. Furthermore, lastly, we show that it is possible to obtain a D-antimagic graph from a previously known distance antimagic graph.


1999 ◽  
Vol 197-198 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 205-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Curtin

2007 ◽  
Vol 307 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1255-1265
Author(s):  
C BALBUENA

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
N. Murugesan ◽  
R. Anitha

2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-220
Author(s):  
A. A. Makhnev

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document