Intro- For TKA, there are two types of bearing designs: xed-bearing and mobile-bearing. Round femoral components articulate with a relatively
at tibial articular surface in a xed-bearing knee design. Because the insert does not hinder the natural movements of the femoral component, the
mobile-bearing (MB) TKA design is thought to allow more exibility of motion than the xed-bearing (FB) variety. Aim and objective: To
compare xed bearing and mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Material and methods:This study is a prospective type of study done at Seth GS
medical college Mumbai, Department of Orthopaedics during August 2019 to June 2021 on patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Patients
who were to undergo total knee arthroplasty were invited to take part in the study. This study, done on them was explained in detail to them. An
informed consent was obtained. Patients fullling the inclusion criteria were listed. Result: Range of motion achieved after mobile arthroplasty
was 123.62±2.94 and in xed arthroplasty it was 121.96±2.74. Pain after last follow up in mobile arthroplasty was 48.83±0.62 and for xed
arthroplasty was 47.39±0.86. Flexion gap after last follow up in mobile arthroplasty was 24.13±0.45 and in xed was 24.02±0.45. Stability was
almost similar in both mobile and xed arthroplasty. Conclusions: there is no signicant difference between xed arthroplasty and mobile
arthroplasty as far as Range of motion, Pain ,Flexion gap. Stability was almost similar in both mobile and xed arthroplasty.
Experimental and clinical analysis of the use of asymmetric vs symmetric polyethylene inserts in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty
