The Use of Decompressive Craniectomy for the Management of Severe Head Injuries

2000 ◽  
pp. 475-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ullrich Meier ◽  
F. S. Zeilinger ◽  
O. Henzka
2013 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 189-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Marsella ◽  
Leonardo Tigan ◽  
Eric Vicaut ◽  
Bernard George ◽  
Jean-Pierre Guichard ◽  
...  

Abstract Aesthetic appearance and brain protection are the main indications for cranial reconstruction following decompressive craniectomy. Recently, few reports indicated that cranioplasty could also improve both, cognitive and functional status. A group of 20 patients were treated with decompressive craniectomy following closed head injury; among these patients, two of them (who represent the subject of the current investigation) had to undergo subsequent cranioplasty removal due to the development of local infection. All patients were evaluated by Glasgow outcome scale, frontal assessment battery and mini-mental state examination at 1 week before completion of the cranioplasty as well as 6 and 24 weeks following cranioplasty. Perfusion computed tomography scans were also performed (1 week before and 6 weeks after cranioplasty) as well as a trans-cranial Doppler 1 week before, and 6 and 24 weeks after. The two patients being the subject of this study were also clinically and radiologically evaluated after cranioplasty removal. These two patients, who represent (not intentionally) two case control, showed a real clinical and cerebral perfusion improvement following repair of the skull defect followed by obvious clinical worsening after the skull flap had to be removed. Cranioplasty is likely not to have just a positive influence on cosmetic and protective features of the patients but also seem to improve both, cognitive and functional status by favorably influencing local and global brain hemodynamic and perfusion.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. E2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian T. Ragel ◽  
Paul Klimo ◽  
Jonathan E. Martin ◽  
Richard J. Teff ◽  
Hans E. Bakken ◽  
...  

Object Decompressive craniectomy (DC) with dural expansion is a life-saving neurosurgical procedure performed for recalcitrant intracranial hypertension due to trauma, stroke, and a multitude of other etiologies. Illustratively, we describe technique and lessons learned using DC for battlefield trauma. Methods Neurosurgical operative logs from service (October 2007 to September 2009) in Afghanistan that detail DC cases for trauma were analyzed. Illustrative examples of frontotemporoparietal and bifrontal DC that depict battlefield experience performing these procedures are presented with attention drawn to the L.G. Kempe hemispherectomy incision, brainstem decompression techniques, and dural onlay substitutes. Results Ninety craniotomies were performed for trauma over the time period analyzed. Of these, 28 (31%) were DCs. Of the 28 DCs, 24 (86%) were frontotemporoparietal DCs, 7 (25%) were bifrontal DCs, and 2 (7%) were suboccipital DCs. Decompressive craniectomies were performed for 19 penetrating head injuries (13 gunshot wounds and 6 explosions) and 9 severe closed head injuries (6 war-related explosions and 3 others). Conclusions Thirty-one percent of craniotomies performed for trauma were DCs. Battlefield neurosurgeons use DC to allow for safe transfer of neurologically ill patients to tertiary military hospitals, which can be located 8–18 hours from a war zone. The authors recommend the L.G. Kempe incision for blood supply preservation, large craniectomies to prevent brain strangulation over bone edges, minimal brain debridement, adequate brainstem decompression, and dural onlay substitutes for dural closure.


2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1502-1509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Skoglund ◽  
Catherine Eriksson-Ritzén ◽  
Christer Jensen ◽  
Bertil Rydenhag

2001 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. A2-A2
Author(s):  
Gilberto Ka Kit Leung ◽  
Michael Wing Yau Lee ◽  
Wai Man Lui ◽  
Wilson Wai Shing Ho

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document