Preparing Medical Knowledge for Diagnostic Expert Systems

Author(s):  
Christian Stary ◽  
Karl Fasching
1992 ◽  
Vol 31 (02) ◽  
pp. 90-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. E. Heckerman ◽  
E. J. Horvitz ◽  
B. N. Nathwani

Abstract:Pathfinder is an expert system that assists surgical pathologists with the diagnosis of lymph-node diseases. The program is one of a growing number of normative expert systems that use probability and decision theory to acquire, represent, manipulate, and explain uncertain medical knowledge. In this article, we describe Pathfinder and our research in uncertain-reasoning paradigms that was stimulated by the development of the program. We discuss limitations with early decision-theoretic methods for reasoning under uncertainty and our initial attempts to use non-decision-theoretic methods. Then, we describe experimental and theoretical results that directed us to return to reasoning methods based in probability and decision theory.


1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 448-449
Author(s):  
Elaine A. Rich
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Khanna ◽  
Suzanne Morrissey ◽  
Amarah Niazi ◽  
Mirabelle Fernandes-Paul ◽  
Michele Gamburd ◽  
...  

IEE Review ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
Peter Zorkoczy
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 270-271
Author(s):  
J. Fallows
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 34 (01/02) ◽  
pp. 131-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Musen ◽  
J. van der Lei

Abstract:The developers of reviewing systems that rely on computer-based patient-record systems as a source of data need to model reviewing knowledge and medical knowledge. We simulate how the same medical knowledge could be entered in four different systems: CARE, the Arden syntax, Essential-attending and HyperCritic. We subsequently analyze how the original knowledge is represented in the symbols or syntax used by these systems. We conclude that these systems provide different alternatives in dealing with the vocabulary provided by the computer-based patient records. In addition, the use of computer-based patient records for review poses new challenges for the content of that record: to facilitate review, the reasoning of the physician needs to be captured in addition to the actions of the physician.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document