A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Coherent Ray-Tracing

1985 ◽  
pp. 11-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Richard Speer ◽  
Tony D. DeRose ◽  
Brian A. Barsky
Author(s):  
Erik Mansson ◽  
Jacob Munkberg ◽  
Tomas Akenine-Moller

2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 294-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Kh. Barladyan ◽  
A. G. Voloboi ◽  
K. A. Vostryakov ◽  
V. A. Galaktionov ◽  
L. Z. Shapiro

2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Wald ◽  
Philipp Slusallek ◽  
Carsten Benthin ◽  
Markus Wagner

1900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Zvonarek

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias R. Mehl ◽  
Shannon E. Holleran

Abstract. In this article, the authors provide an empirical analysis of the obtrusiveness of and participants' compliance with a relatively new psychological ambulatory assessment method, called the electronically activated recorder or EAR. The EAR is a modified portable audio-recorder that periodically records snippets of ambient sounds from participants' daily environments. In tracking moment-to-moment ambient sounds, the EAR yields an acoustic log of a person's day as it unfolds. As a naturalistic observation sampling method, it provides an observer's account of daily life and is optimized for the assessment of audible aspects of participants' naturally-occurring social behaviors and interactions. Measures of self-reported and behaviorally-assessed EAR obtrusiveness and compliance were analyzed in two samples. After an initial 2-h period of relative obtrusiveness, participants habituated to wearing the EAR and perceived it as fairly unobtrusive both in a short-term (2 days, N = 96) and a longer-term (10-11 days, N = 11) monitoring. Compliance with the method was high both during the short-term and longer-term monitoring. Somewhat reduced compliance was identified over the weekend; this effect appears to be specific to student populations. Important privacy and data confidentiality considerations around the EAR method are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document