Recent Developments in the Mean Square Theory of the Riemann Zeta and Other Zeta-Functions

Number Theory ◽  
2000 ◽  
pp. 241-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohji Matsumoto
Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 754 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. L. Ashton ◽  
A. S. Fokas

In this paper, several relations are obtained among the Riemann zeta and Hurwitz zeta functions, as well as their products. A particular case of these relations give rise to a simple re-derivation of the important results of Katsurada and Matsumoto on the mean square of the Hurwitz zeta function. Also, a relation derived here provides the starting point of a novel approach which, in a series of companion papers, yields a formal proof of the Lindelöf hypothesis. Some of the above relations motivate the need for analysing the large α behaviour of the modified Hurwitz zeta function ζ 1 ( s , α ) , s ∈ C , α ∈ ( 0 , ∞ ) , which is also presented here.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2019 (22) ◽  
pp. 6924-6932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Aistleitner ◽  
Kamalakshya Mahatab ◽  
Marc Munsch

Abstract We prove that there are arbitrarily large values of t such that $|\zeta (1+it)| \geq e^{\gamma } (\log _{2} t +\log _{3} t) + \mathcal{O}(1)$. This essentially matches the prediction for the optimal lower bound in a conjecture of Granville and Soundararajan. Our proof uses a new variant of the “long resonator” method. While earlier implementations of this method crucially relied on a “sparsification” technique to control the mean-square of the resonator function, in the present paper we exploit certain self-similarity properties of a specially designed resonator function.


2008 ◽  
Vol 83 (97) ◽  
pp. 71-86
Author(s):  
Yifan Yang

Let ?(T) and E(T) be the error terms in the classical Dirichlet divisor problem and in the asymptotic formula for the mean square of the Riemann zeta function in the critical strip, respectively. We show that ?(T) and E(T) are asymptotic integral transforms of each other. We then use this integral representation of ?(T) to give a new proof of a result of M. Jutila.


2003 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Garunk?tis ◽  
A. Laurin?ikas ◽  
J. Steuding
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 85 (99) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Ivic

It is proved that, for T? ? G = G(T)? ??T, ?T2T(I1(t+G,G)- I1(t,G))2 dt = TG ?aj logj (?T/G)+ O?(T1+? G1/2+ +T1/2?G? with some explicitly computable constants aj(a3>0)where, for fixed K ? N, Ik(t,G)= 1/?? ? ? -? |?(1/2 + it + iu)|2k e -(u/G)?du. The generalizations to the mean square of I1(t+U,G)-I1(t,G) over [T,T+H] and the estimation of the mean square of I2(t+ U,G) - I2(t,G) are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document