Proof of the functional equation for the Riemann zeta-function

In this article, we shall prove a result which enables us to transfer from finite to infinite Euler products. As an example, we give two new proofs of the infinite product for the sine function depending on certain decompositions. We shall then prove some equivalent expressions for the functional equation, i.e. the partial fraction expansion and the integral expression involving the generating function for Bernoulli numbers. The equivalence of the infinite product for the sine functions and the partial fraction expansion for the hyperbolic cotangent function leads to a new proof of the functional equation for the Riemann zeta function.

Investigation of a Control Function Determining the Location of the Zeros as a Possible Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis.

The article examines the control function in relation to the distribution of Zeros on thecritical line x = 0,5. To confirm this hypothesis, it will be necessary to perform a large number ofstatistical analyzes of the distribution of non-trivial zero points of the Riemann Zeta function.

On the Asymptotics to all Orders of the Riemann Zeta Function and of a Two-Parameter Generalization of the Riemann Zeta Function

We present several formulae for the large t t asymptotics of the Riemann zeta function ζ ( s ) \zeta (s) , s = σ + i t s=\sigma +i t , 0 ≤ σ ≤ 1 0\leq \sigma \leq 1 , t > 0 t>0 , which are valid to all orders. A particular case of these results coincides with the classical results of Siegel. Using these formulae, we derive explicit representations for the sum ∑ a b n − s \sum _a^b n^{-s} for certain ranges of a a and b b . In addition, we present precise estimates relating this sum with the sum ∑ c d n s − 1 \sum _c^d n^{s-1} for certain ranges of a , b , c , d a, b, c, d . We also study a two-parameter generalization of the Riemann zeta function which we denote by Φ ( u , v , β ) \Phi (u,v,\beta ) , u ∈ C u\in \mathbb {C} , v ∈ C v\in \mathbb {C} , β ∈ R \beta \in \mathbb {R} . Generalizing the methodology used in the study of ζ ( s ) \zeta (s) , we derive asymptotic formulae for Φ ( u , v , β ) \Phi (u,v, \beta ) .

The Nicolas Criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis

In mathematics, the Riemann hypothesis is a conjecture that the Riemann zeta function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part $\frac{1}{2}$. For every prime number $p_{n}$, we define the sequence $X_{n} = \prod_{q \leq p_{n}} \frac{q}{q-1} - e^{\gamma} \times \log \theta(p_{n})$, where $\theta(x)$ is the Chebyshev function and $\gamma \approx 0.57721$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. The Nicolas criterion states that the Riemann hypothesis is true if and only if $X_{n} > 0$ holds for all primes $p_{n} > 2$. For every prime number $p_{k} > 2$, $X_{k} > 0$ is called the Nicolas inequality. We prove that the Nicolas inequality holds for all primes $p_{n} > 2$. In this way, we demonstrate that the Riemann hypothesis is true.

The Vortex-like Behavior of the Riemann Zeta Function to the Right of the Critical Strip

Based on an equivalence relation that was established recently on exponential sums, in this paper we study the class of functions that are equivalent to the Riemann zeta function in the half-plane $$\{s\in {\mathbb {C}}:\mathrm{Re}\, s>1\}$$ { s ∈ C : Re s > 1 } . In connection with this class of functions, we first determine the value of the maximum abscissa from which the images of any function in it cannot take a prefixed argument. The main result shows that each of these functions experiments a vortex-like behavior in the sense that the main argument of its images varies indefinitely near the vertical line $$\mathrm{Re}\, s=1$$ Re s = 1 . In particular, regarding the Riemann zeta function $$\zeta (s)$$ ζ ( s ) , for every $$\sigma _0>1$$ σ 0 > 1 we can assure the existence of a relatively dense set of real numbers $$\{t_m\}_{m\ge 1}$$ { t m } m ≥ 1 such that the parametrized curve traced by the points $$(\mathrm{Re} (\zeta (\sigma +it_m)),\mathrm{Im}(\zeta (\sigma +it_m)))$$ ( Re ( ζ ( σ + i t m ) ) , Im ( ζ ( σ + i t m ) ) ) , with $$\sigma \in (1,\sigma _0)$$ σ ∈ ( 1 , σ 0 ) , makes a prefixed finite number of turns around the origin.

The Values of the Periodic Zeta-Function at the Nontrivial Zeros of Riemann’s Zeta-Function

In this paper, we prove an asymptotic formula for the sum of the values of the periodic zeta-function at the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta-function (up to some height) which are symmetrical on the real line and the critical line. This is an extension of the previous results due to Garunkštis, Kalpokas, and, more recently, Sowa. Whereas Sowa’s approach was assuming the yet unproved Riemann hypothesis, our result holds unconditionally.

The Nicolas criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis

In mathematics, the Riemann hypothesis is a conjecture that the Riemann zeta function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part $\frac{1}{2}$. For every prime number $p_{n}$, we define the sequence $X_{n} = \prod_{q \leq p_{n}} \frac{q}{q-1} - e^{\gamma} \times \log \theta(p_{n})$, where $\theta(x)$ is the Chebyshev function and $\gamma \approx 0.57721$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. The Nicolas criterion states that the Riemann hypothesis is true if and only if $X_{n} > 0$ holds for all primes $p_{n} > 2$. For every prime number $p_{k} > 2$, $X_{k} > 0$ is called the Nicolas inequality. We prove that the Nicolas inequality holds for all primes $p_{n} > 2$. In this way, we demonstrate that the Riemann hypothesis is true.

Lambert series associated to Hilbert modular form

In 1981, Zagier conjectured that the Lambert series associated to the weight 12 cusp form [Formula: see text] should have an asymptotic expansion in terms of the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function. This conjecture was proven by Hafner and Stopple. In 2017 and 2019, Chakraborty et al. established an asymptotic relation between Lambert series associated to any primitive cusp form (for full modular group, congruence subgroup and in Maass form case) and the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function. In this paper, we study Lambert series associated with primitive Hilbert modular form and establish similar kind of asymptotic expansion.

The second moment of Sn(t) on the Riemann hypothesis

Let [Formula: see text] be the argument of the Riemann zeta-function at the point [Formula: see text]. For [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] define its antiderivatives as [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] is a specific constant depending on [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. In 1925, Littlewood proved, under the Riemann Hypothesis (RH), that [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text]. In 1946, Selberg unconditionally established the explicit asymptotic formulas for the second moments of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. This was extended by Fujii for [Formula: see text], when [Formula: see text]. Assuming the RH, we give the explicit asymptotic formula for the second moment of [Formula: see text] up to the second-order term, for [Formula: see text]. Our result conditionally refines Selberg’s and Fujii’s formulas and extends previous work by Goldston in [Formula: see text], where the case [Formula: see text] was considered.