The Mixed Case

Author(s):  
Gordon Tullock
Keyword(s):  
1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Jordan ◽  
Laree A. Huntsman
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 6-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelmgeid AminAli ◽  
Al�Hussien Seddik Saad

Author(s):  
Douglas Schenck ◽  
Peter Wilson

Here is the entire syntax except for constant tokens (i.e., reserved words and such), character sets, standard constants, functions and procedures, and simple equates to tokens that create or reference identifiers. The following conventions will help to interpret the syntax presentation: • Identifiers written in upper case letters are keywords of the language. For example, when you see SCHEMA this means that the word ‘schema’ must be written at this place (using mixed case if you wish.) The names of these syntax productions are identical to the keywords of the language. • Elements that follow the pattern xxxDef represent an identifier declaration. For example, VarDef shows where a variable declaration takes place. This also implies that the name created at this place is subject to the scoping rules that apply to the object in question. • Elements that follow the pattern xxxRef represent a reference to some explicit definition. For example, a VarRef requires a VarDef.


1995 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 332-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Barhen ◽  
J.J. Daudin

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (01) ◽  
pp. 79-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
GILES AUCHMUTY

This paper proves some simple inequalities for Sobolev vector fields on nice bounded three-dimensional regions, subject to homogeneous mixed normal and tangential boundary data. The fields just have divergence and curl in L2. For the limit cases of prescribed zero normal, respectively zero tangential, data on the whole boundary, the inequalities were proved by Friedrichs who called the result the main inequality of vector analysis. For this mixed case, the optimal constants in the inequality are described, together with the fields for which equality holds. The detailed results depend on a special orthogonal decomposition and the analysis of associated eigenvalue problems.


2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 844-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Mayall ◽  
Glyn W. Humphreys ◽  
Andrea Mechelli ◽  
Andrew Olson ◽  
Cathy J. Price

The early stages of visual word recognition were investigated by scanning participants using PET as they took part in implicit and explicit reading tasks with visually disrupted stimuli. CaSe MiXiNg has been shown in behavioral studies to increase reaction times (RTs) in naming and other word recognition tasks. In this study, we found that during both an implicit (feature detection) task and an explicit word-naming task, mixed-case words compared to same-case words produced increased activation in an area of the right parietal cortex previously associated with visual attention. No effect of case was found in this area for pseudowords or consonant strings. Further, lowering the contrast of the stimuli slowed RTs as much as case mixing, but did not lead to the same increase in right parietal activation. No significant effect of case mixing was observed in left-hemisphere language areas. The results suggest that reading mixed-case words requires increased attentional processing. However, later word recognition processes may be relatively unaffected by the disruption in presentation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document