Integrating Social Aspects into Urban Water Pricing: Australian and International Perspectives

Author(s):  
Noel Wai Wah Chan
2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh Sibly
Keyword(s):  

Water Policy ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 930-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Molinos-Senante

A strong seasonal demand for water occurs in many tourist areas, which might exacerbate the water shortage problems. Water pricing is a key instrument for water use management; therefore, the objective of this work was to design a variable water rate to examine the seasonal water demand in water-scarce regions. The proposed water rate combines the peak-load pricing (PLP) and increasing block rate (IBR) strategies. PLP results in full cost recovery of urban water services; however, IBRs penalise excessive water consumption. Moreover, the proposed water rate structure allocates the costs among users depending on their consumption. Subsequently, an empirical application was developed for a Spanish tourist town illustrating the usefulness of the water rate proposed. In conclusion, the combination of the PLP and IBR approaches is a useful water-pricing strategy for increasing the sustainability of the urban water supply under the conditions of seasonal water demand and water shortage.


Author(s):  
LIN CRASE ◽  
SUE O'KEEFE ◽  
BRIAN DOLLERY

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Al-Saidi ◽  
Sudeh Dehnavi

Urban water pricing is becoming increasingly important due to the rapid rate of urbanization and the expansion of water reclamation and reuse. The mounting evidence of failures of current pricing schemes makes analyzing their performance essential for understanding the adequacy of economic and sustainability policies in water management. However, urban water pricing policies are complex, serve multiple objectives, and vary widely across regions and countries. This paper presents an assessment framework for urban water pricing policies based on common conditions advocated for well-functioning pricing policies. Using a simplified scorecard, it compares the performance of urban water pricing policies in Jordan and Iran, two countries under growing scarcity pressure. Both countries show serious deficiencies with regard to the economic valuation of water services and the cost recovery of utilities. Public policies are rather oriented towards access and affordability, with Jordan showing a higher level of transparency and competition in tariff-setting. The assessment tool indicates a high potential for experience-sharing in future reforms, which should promote water as a scarce good. Such reforms need to prioritize full cost valuation, participation, and scientifically based designs of local and regional water tariffs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document