Vascular Pain

Author(s):  
Kellie Gates ◽  
Pegah Safaeian
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiping Song ◽  
Shibiao Chen ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Xiaoyun Shi ◽  
Na Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hypertonic saline solution has been frequently utilized in clinical practice. However, due to the nonphysiological osmolality, hypertonic saline infusion usually induces local vascular pain. We conducted this study to evaluate the effect of lidocaine coinfusion for alleviating vascular pain induced by hypertonic saline. Methods One hundred and six patients undergoing hypertonic saline volume preloading prior to spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to two groups of 53 each. Group L received a 1 mg/kg lidocaine bolus followed by infusion of 2 mg/kg/h through the same IV line during hypertonic saline infusion; Group C received a bolus and infusion of normal saline of equivalent volume. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of vascular pain were recorded every 4 min. Results The vascular pain severity in Group L was significantly lower than that in Group C for each time slot (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of vascular pain during hypertonic saline infusion in Group L was 48.0%, which was significantly lower than the incidence (79.6%) in Group C (P < 0.05). Conclusion Lidocaine coinfusion could effectively alleviate vascular pain induced by hypertonic saline infusion. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, number: ChiCTR1900023753. Registered on 10 June 2019.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 210
Author(s):  
So Ryoung Seong ◽  
Namju Lee ◽  
Mi Jin Lee ◽  
Hyun Ah Jang ◽  
Min Ju Song ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aiji Boku ◽  
Mika Inoue ◽  
Hiroshi Hanamoto ◽  
Aiko Oyamaguchi ◽  
Chiho Kudo ◽  
...  

Intravenous sedation with propofol is often administered to anxious patients in dental practice. Pain on injection of propofol is a common adverse effect. This study aimed to determine the age-adjusted doses of midazolam required to erase memory of vascular pain of propofol administration and assess whether the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) after the pretreatment of midazolam was useful to predict amnesia of the vascular pain of propofol administration. A total of 246 patients with dental phobia requiring dental treatment under intravenous sedation were included. Patients were classified according to their age: 30s, 40s, 50s, and 60s. Three minutes after administration of a predetermined dose of midazolam, propofol was infused continuously. After completion of the dental procedure, patients were interviewed about the memory of any pain or discomfort in the injection site or forearm. The dosage of midazolam was determined using the Dixon up-down method. The first patient was administered 0.03 mg/kg, and if memory of vascular pain remained, the dosage was increased by 0.01 mg/kg for the next patient, and then if the memory was erased, the dosage was decreased by 0.01 mg/kg. The effective dosage of midazolam in 95% of each age group for erasing the memory of propofol vascular pain (ED95) was determined using logistic analysis. The accuracy of RSS to predict the amnesia of injection pain was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The ED95 of midazolam to erase the memory of propofol vascular pain was 0.061 mg/kg in patients in their 30s, 0.049 mg/kg in patients in their 40s, 0.033 mg/kg in patients in their 50s, and 0.033 mg/kg in patients in their 60s. The area under the ROC curve was 0.31. The ED95 of midazolam required to erase the memory of propofol vascular pain demonstrated a downward trend with age. On the other hand, it was impossible to predict the amnesia of propofol vascular pain using the RSS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 343-348
Author(s):  
KAZUKI UCHIYAMA ◽  
YOSHITAKA SAITO ◽  
TATSUHIKO SAKAMOTO ◽  
YOH TAKEKUMA ◽  
YOSHITO KOMATSU ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Ok Hwan Kim ◽  
Myung Ha Yoon ◽  
Chel Won Jeong ◽  
Hyung Gon Lee ◽  
Woong Mo Kim

2020 ◽  
pp. 106002802096935
Author(s):  
Shigeru Ishida ◽  
Yoko Makihara ◽  
Hiroyuki Watanabe ◽  
Takafumi Nakashima ◽  
Kenichiro Nagata ◽  
...  

Background: Peripheral intravenous injection of gemcitabine often causes vascular pain; however, preventive measures have not yet been established. Objectives: This study focused on identifying predictive factors for gemcitabine-induced vascular pain. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed risk factors for developing vascular pain in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine infusions at our institution. Infusions were divided into groups according to presence or absence of vascular pain symptoms, and variables were compared. Odds ratios for risk factors were calculated using logistic regression analyses. Results: Overall, 272 patients with pancreatic cancer were subjected to 725 gemcitabine infusions, and of these, 18.4% (n = 50) experienced vascular pain. There were significant differences in the gemcitabine dose ( P = 0.025), dose of gemcitabine/body surface area (BSA; P = 0.004), concentration of gemcitabine ( P = 0.025), and hot pack use ( P = 0.011) between the vascular pain and no vascular pain groups. Multivariable analyses indicated that gemcitabine dose/BSA and lack of hot pack use were risk factors for developing vascular pain. Moreover, on administration of a higher dosage (>930 mg/m2), the incidence of vascular pain in patients using a hot pack (6.7%) was significantly lower than that in patients not provided a hot pack (16.2%). Conclusions and Relevance: High gemcitabine dosages and lack of hot pack use were predictive factors for gemcitabine-induced vascular pain in patients with pancreatic cancer. Patients receiving gemcitabine treatment should apply a hot pack to the injection site. Scrupulous clinical attention is required for patients presenting with these risk factors to improve pain management.


1948 ◽  
Vol 116 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 56-65
Author(s):  
C. van Gelderen
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document