Time and Frequency Transfer of Satellite Two-Way Carrier Phase and Its Error Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 1602-1607
Author(s):  
Jiangting Wang
Keyword(s):  
Error Analysis ◽  
Carrier Phase ◽  
Frequency Transfer

scholarly journals Combining GPS, BeiDou, and Galileo Satellite Systems for Time and Frequency Transfer Based on Carrier Phase Observations

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Zhang ◽  
Rui Tu ◽  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Yuping Gao ◽  
Hongbin Cai
Keyword(s):  
Carrier Phase ◽  
Satellite Systems ◽  
Frequency Transfer ◽  
Galileo Satellite

Time and frequency transfer using BDS‐2 and BDS‐3 carrier‐phase observations

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1249-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Zhang ◽  
Rui Tu ◽  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Na Liu ◽  
Yuping Gao
Keyword(s):  
Carrier Phase ◽  
Frequency Transfer

Carrier-phase-based two-way satellite time and frequency transfer

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 2625-2630 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fujieda ◽  
T. Gotoh ◽  
F. Nakagawa ◽  
R. Tabuchi ◽  
M. Aida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carrier Phase ◽  
Frequency Transfer

scholarly journals Comparison of Multi-GNSS Time and Frequency Transfer Performance Using Overlap-Frequency Observations

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 3130
Author(s):  
Pengfei Zhang ◽  
Rui Tu ◽  
Yuping Gao ◽  
Ju Hong ◽  
Junqiang Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carrier Phase ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Transfer Performance ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Time Transfer ◽  
Difference Series ◽  
Frequency Transfer ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

The modernized GPS, Galileo, and BeiDou global navigation satellite system (BDS3) offers new potential for time transfer using overlap-frequency (L1/E1/B1, L5/E5a/B2a) observations. To assess the performance of time and frequency transfer with overlap-frequency observations for GPS, Galileo, and BDS3, the mathematical models of single- and dual-frequency using the carrier-phase (CP) technique are discussed and presented. For the single-frequency CP model, the three-day average RMS values of the L5/E5a/B2a clock difference series were 0.218 ns for Galileo and 0.263 ns for BDS3, of which the improvements were 36.2% for Galileo and 43.9% for BDS3 when compared with the L1/E1/B1 solution at BRUX–PTBB. For the hydrogen–cesium time link BRUX–KIRU, the RMS values of the L5/E5a/B2a solution were 0.490 ns for Galileo and 0.608 ns for BDS3, improving Galileo by 6.4% and BDS3 by 12.5% when compared with the L1/E1/B1 solution. For the dual-frequency CP model, the average stability values of the L5/E5a/B2a solution at the BRUX–PTBB time link were 3.54∙× 10−12 for GPS, 2.20 × 10−12 for Galileo, and 2.69 × 10−12 for BDS3, of which the improvements were 21.0%, 45.1%, and 52.3%, respectively, when compared with the L1/E1/B1 solution. For the BRUX–KIRU time link, the improvements were 4.2%, 30.5%, and 36.1%, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document