Frequency Hopping Patterns for Low Probability of Intercept (LPI) Radars Using Costas Arrays

2021 ◽  
pp. 401-411
Author(s):  
T. A. N. S. N. Varma ◽  
Anjaneyulu Gera
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Stevens

Low probability of intercept radar signals, which are often problematic to detect and characterize, have as their goal ‘to see and not be seen’. Digital intercept receivers are currently moving away from Fourier-based analysis and towards classical time-frequency analysis techniques for the purpose of analyzing these low probability of intercept radar signals. Although these classical time-frequency analysis techniques are an improvement over existing Fourier-based techniques, they still suffer from a lack of readability –which can be caused by poor time-frequency localization (such as the spectrogram), which may in turn lead to inaccurate detection and parameter extraction. In this study, the reassignment method, because of its ability to improve time-frequency localization, is proposed as an improved signal analysis technique to address the poor time-frequency localization deficiency of the spectrogram. This paper presents the novel approach of characterizing low probability of intercept frequency hopping radar signals through utilization and direct comparison of the spectrogram versus the reassigned spectrogram.


Author(s):  
Daniel L. Stevens ◽  
Stephanie A. Schuckers

Low probability of intercept radar signals, which are often challenging to detect and characterize, have as their objective ‘to see and not be seen’. Digital intercept receivers are currently moving from Fourier-based techniques to classical time-frequency techniques for the analysis of low probability of intercept radar signals. This paper presents the novel approach of characterizing low probability of intercept frequency hopping radar signals through utilization and direct comparison of the Wigner Ville Distribuion versus the Choi Williams Distribution. Two different frequency hopping low probability of intercept radar signals were analyzed (4-component and 8-component). The following metrics were used for evaluation: percent error of:carrier frequency, modulation bandwidth, modulation period, and time-frequency localization. Also used were: percent detection, lowest signaltonoise ratio for signal detection, and plot (processing) time.


Author(s):  
Daniel L. Stevens ◽  
Stephanie A. Schuckers

Low probability of intercept radar signals, which are often problematic to detect and characterize, have as their goal ‘to see and not be seen’. Digital intercept receivers are currently moving away from Fourier-based analysis and towards classical time-frequency analysis techniques for the purpose of analyzing these low probability of intercept radar signals. This paper presents the novel approach of characterizing low probability of intercept frequency hopping radar signals through utilization and direct comparison of the Spectrogram versus the Scalogram. Two different frequency hopping low probability of intercept radar signals were analyzed(4-component and 8-component). The following metrics were used for evaluation: percent error of:carrier frequency, modulation bandwidth, modulation period, and time-frequency localization. Also used were: percent detection, lowest signal-to-noise ratio for signal detection, and plot (processing) time. Experimental results demonstrate that overall,theScalogram produced more accurate characterization metrics than the Spectrogram. An improvement in performance may well translate into saved equipment and lives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document