Role of Assisted Operative Hysteroscopy in Asherman’s Management

2020 ◽  
pp. 123-135
Author(s):  
Jude E. Okohue
Author(s):  
F Ghezzi ◽  
P Beretta ◽  
E Bernasconi ◽  
A Cromi ◽  
E Di Naro ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
pp. 187-204
Author(s):  
D. Wallwiener ◽  
S. Rimbach ◽  
D. Pollmann ◽  
J. Gauwerky ◽  
G. Bastert ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huaxin Wang ◽  
Xuan Peng ◽  
Yeda Xiao ◽  
Bo Zhao ◽  
Liying Zhan

Abstract Background The role of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion has been previously evaluated for pain relief, inflammatory response, and post-operative recovery, including in endoscopic surgery. The present study is a randomized double-blinded trial in which we evaluated whether intravenous lidocaine infusion would reduce postoperative pain, propofol requirement and remifentanil consumption in patients undergoing hysteroscopy surgery. Methods Eighty-five patients scheduled to undergo elective operative hysteroscopy surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into two groups. Group L included patients who received an intravenous lidocaine bolus 1.5mg/kg over 3 min followed by a continuous infusion at the rate of 2 mg/kg/h until surgery completed, and Group C received 0.9% normal saline solution at an equivalent rate. The depth of anesthesia was monitored using the Narcotrend, which was based on measurement of the patient’s cerebral electrical activity. Primary outcome of the study was postoperative hypogastric pain evaluating by visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include propofol requirement and remifentanil requirement. Results VAS score of Group L was significantly lower than Group C at postoperative 0.5 h, 4 h, respectively (P < 0.05), while no obvious difference was found at postoperative 24 h. There was no difference between groups in propofol requirement, but Group L required less dosage of remifentanil than Group C (P < 0.05). Moreover, the incidence of throat pain was significantly lower in Group L. No adverse events associated with lidocaine was discovered. Conclusions Administration of intravenous lidocaine infusion as an adjuvant alleviated short-term postoperative hypogastric pain and throat pain, and reduced remifentanil requirement in patients undergoing operative hysteroscopy surgery.


2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa Casadei ◽  
Eleonora Piccolo ◽  
Claudia Manicuti ◽  
Silvia Cardinale ◽  
Matteo Collamarini ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nayana DH ◽  
Shreya S.

Background: Hysteroscopy has become the gold standard for diagnosis of intrauterine abnormalities. Intrauterine lesions such as adhesions, uterine septum polyps or submucous myomas are diagnosed much more precisely by hysteroscopy and are detectable in 10-15% of women seeking treatment for subfertility. The present study analyses various etiological factors in infertility diagnosed by hysteroscopy and to evaluate therapeutic interventions done during hysteroscopy.Methods: The cases for the study will include all women with primary or secondary infertility admitted in tertiary health centre from April 2016 to May 2018 for hysteroscopy.Results: Out of 90 subjects 66 (73.3%) were primary infertility and 24 (26.7%) were secondary infertility. Out of 90 cases studied, 68 (75.6%) had normal findings, 10 (11.1%) had endometrial polyps, 01 (1.1%) had submucous fibroid, 5 (5.6%) had septate uterus, hyperplastic endometrium in 3 (3.3%) and atropic endometrium in 1 (1.1%), intrauterine adhesions and hypoplastic uterus in 1 each. Hysteroscopic interventions were performed in the form of curettage in 08 (33.3%), hysteroscopic cannulation in 2 (8.3%), polypectomy and septal resection in 5 (20.8%) cases each, submucosal fibroid resection in 1 (4.2%) cases, tubal block released in 2 (8.3%).Conclusions: Hysteroscopy was found the best method in evaluation of intrauterine conditions for subfertility and also the type and location of uterine abnormalities can be precisely noted. The removal of those changes during operative hysteroscopy increases the fertility rate in women treated during this procedure.


JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Fernbach
Keyword(s):  

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. E. Van Metre

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document