Note on a consequence for affine groups of the classification theorem for finite simple groups

1983 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
JenniferD. Key

1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1171-1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Loveys

The Classification Theorem for ℵ0-categorical strictly minimal sets says that if H is strictly minimal and ℵ0-categorical, either H has in effect no structure at all or is essentially an affine or projective space over a finite field. Zil′ber, in [Z2], showed that if H were a counterexample to this Classification Theorem it would interpret a rank 2, degree 1 pseudoplane. Cherlin later noticed (see [CHL, Appendices 2 and 3], for the proof) that the Classification Theorem is a consequence of the Classification Theorem for finite simple groups. In [Z4] and [Z5], Zil′ber found a quite different proof of the Classification Theorem using no deep group theory.Meanwhile in [Z3], Zil′ber introduced the notion of envelope in an attempt to prove that no complete totally categorical theory T can be finitely axiomatizable. The idea of the proof was to show that if M is a model of such a T and H ⊆ M is strongly minimal, then an envelope of any sufficiently large finite subset of H is a finite model of any fixed finite subset of T. [Z3] contains an error, which Zil′ber has since corrected (in a nontrivial way).In [CHL], Cherlin, Harrington and Lachlan used the Classification Theorem to expand and reorganize Zil′ber's work. In particular, they generalized most of his work to ℵ0-categorical, ℵ0-stable structures, proved the Morley rank is finite in these structures, and introduced the powerful Coordinatization Theorem (Theorem 3.1 of [CHL]; Proposition 1.14 of the present paper). They also showed that ℵ0-categorical, ℵ0-stable structures are not finitely axiomatizable using a notion of envelope that is the same as Zil′ber's except in one particularly perverse case; [CHL]'s notion of envelope is used throughout the current paper. Peretyat'kin [P] has found an example of an ℵ1-categorical finitely axiomatizable structure.



2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 455-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arindam Biswas ◽  
Yilong Yang


2013 ◽  
Vol 142 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 391-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelly Garion ◽  
Matteo Penegini


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 999-1016
Author(s):  
Anatoly S. Kondrat’ev ◽  
Natalia V. Maslova ◽  
Danila O. Revin

AbstractA subgroup H of a group G is said to be pronormal in G if H and {H^{g}} are conjugate in {\langle H,H^{g}\rangle} for every {g\in G}. In this paper, we determine the finite simple groups of type {E_{6}(q)} and {{}^{2}E_{6}(q)} in which all the subgroups of odd index are pronormal. Thus, we complete a classification of finite simple exceptional groups of Lie type in which all the subgroups of odd index are pronormal.



2018 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 405-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Kondrat’ev ◽  
N. V. Maslova ◽  
D. O. Revin


2001 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 135-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Lübeck

AbstractThe author has determined, for all simple simply connected reductive linear algebraic groups defined over a finite field, all the irreducible representations in their defining characteristic of degree below some bound. These also give the small degree projective representations in defining characteristic for the corresponding finite simple groups. For large rank l, this bound is proportional to l3, and for rank less than or equal to 11 much higher. The small rank cases are based on extensive computer calculations.



2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Ghasemabadi ◽  
A. Iranmanesh ◽  
F. Mavadatpour




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document