Recognition of the 1811?1812 New Madrid earthquakes in Reelfoot Lake, Tennessee sediments using pollen data

1996 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
JuneE. Mirecki
2005 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. P. Tuttle ◽  
E. S. Schweig ◽  
J. Campbell ◽  
P. M. Thomas ◽  
J. D. Sims ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Susan Elizabeth Hough ◽  
Roger G. Bilham

Like any proper mystery, the tale of the New Madrid earthquakes begins on a note of intrigue. According to legend, the earthquakes were predicted—even prophesied—by the great Shawnee leader and statesman Tecumseh. Concerned over continued encroachment of white settlers onto Indian lands in the mid continent, Tecumseh traveled widely throughout the central United States in the early 1800s, striving to unite diverse tribes to stand against further land cessions. According to legend, Tecumseh told his mostly Creek followers at Tuckabatchee, Alabama, that he had proof of the Great Spirit’s wrath. The sign blazed across the heavens for all to see—the great comet of 1811, a dazzling and mysterious sight. As if to emphasize Tecumseh’s words, the comet grew in brilliance through October, dimming in the night time sky in November just as Tecumseh left Tuckabatchee for points northward. Also according to legend, Tecumseh’s speech at Tuckabatchee told of an even more dramatic sign yet to come. In an oration delivered to hundreds of listeners, the leader reportedly told the crowd, “You do not believe the Great Spirit has sent me. You shall know. I leave Tuckabatchee directly, and shall go straight to Detroit. When I arrive there, I will stamp on the ground with my foot and shake down every house in Tuckabatchee.” The Creeks counted the days until the one calculated to mark Tecumseh’s return, and on that day— December 16, 1811—the first of the great New Madrid earthquakes struck, destroying all of the houses in Tuckabatchee. Tecumseh’s Prophecy, as it has come to be known, strikes a chord with those inclined to see Spirit and earth as intertwined. But it can also capture the imagination of those who see phenomena such as earthquakes as the exclusive purview of science. What if Tecumseh’s Prophecy was born not of communication with the Great Spirit, but instead of an ability to recognize signs from the earth itself? According to the renowned English geologist Sir Charles Lyell, Native American oral traditions told of devastating earthquakes in the New Madrid region prior to 1811.


2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 1233-1234
Author(s):  
Alisa F. Stewart ◽  
Jonathan P. Stewart

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-209
Author(s):  
CONEVERY BOLTON VALENCIUS

1992 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven G. Wesnousky ◽  
Lisa M. Leffler

Abstract The great 1811–12 New Madrid earthquakes produced extensive liquefaction in the meisoseismal zone, which is largely within the St. Francis drainage basin of Missouri and Arkansas. We examined 10’s of kilometers of ditch banks within the meisoseismal zone for evidence of prehistoric liquefaction events. Radiocarbon dates indicate that the exposures studied provide a record of the last 5,000 to 10,000 years. Our search has revealed no evidence of widespread paleoliquefaction events and, hence, provides no independent support for the relatively short 550 to 1100 year return time of 1811–12 type earthquakes implied by analyses of the statistics of historical seismicity.


2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conevery Bolton Valencius

ArgumentThe New Madrid earthquakes shook much of North America in the winter of 1811–1812. Accounts of the New Madrid earthquakes originally were collected and employed as scientific evidence in the early nineteenth century. These early accounts were largely ignored when scientific instruments promised more quantitative and exact knowledge. Years later the earthquakes themselves became both more important and less understood because of changes in scientific models. Today, so-called intraplate or stable continental region earthquakes pose a significant problem in seismology. Historical accounts of the New Madrid events offer some of the most significant examples upon which researchers can draw and form the basis for debates over present public policy. The changing function of accounts, from narrative elements of widely-shared scientific discussion, to raw data, and back into wide-ranging conversation once again, demonstrates both deep ruptures and surprising continuities during two centuries of understanding the earth and its movement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document