Central-place foraging in honey bees: the effect of travel time and nectar flow on crop filling

1986 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kacelnik ◽  
A. I. Houston ◽  
P. Schmid-Hempel
Author(s):  
Fabrice Requier ◽  
Mickaël Henry ◽  
Axel Decourtye ◽  
François Brun ◽  
Pierrick Aupinel ◽  
...  

AbstractMeasuring time-activity budgets over the complete individual lifespan is now possible for many animals with the recent advances of life-long individual monitoring devices. Although analyses of changes in the patterns of time-activity budgets have revealed ontogenetic shifts in birds or mammals, no such technique has been applied to date on insects.We tested an automated breakpoint-based procedure to detect, assess and quantify shifts in the temporal pattern of the flight activities in honey bees. We assumed that the learning and foraging stages of honey bees will differ in several respects, to detect the age at onset of foraging (AOF).Using an extensive dataset covering the life-long monitoring of 2,100 individuals, we compared the AOF outputs with the more conventional approaches based on arbitrary thresholds. We further evaluated the robustness of the different methods comparing the foraging time-activity budget allocations between the presumed foragers and confirmed foragers.We revealed a clear-cut learning-foraging ontogenetic shift that differs in duration, frequency, and time of occurrence of flights. Although AOF appeared to be highly plastic among bees, the breakpoint-based procedure seems better able to detect it than arbitrary threshold-based methods that are unable to deal with inter-individual variation.We developed the aof R-package including a broad range of examples with both simulated and empirical dataset to illustrate the simplicity of use of the procedure. This simple procedure is generic enough to be derived from any individual life-long monitoring devices recording the time-activity budgets of honey bees, and could propose new ecological applications of bio-logging to detect ontogenetic shifts in the behaviour of central-place foraging insects.


2007 ◽  
Vol 170 (6) ◽  
pp. 902
Author(s):  
Fagan ◽  
Frithjof Lutscher ◽  
Katie Schneider

The Condor ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S Elgin ◽  
Robert G Clark ◽  
Christy A Morrissey

Abstract Millions of wetland basins, embedded in croplands and grasslands, are biodiversity hotspots in North America’s Prairie Pothole Region, but prairie wetlands continue to be degraded and drained, primarily for agricultural activities. Aerial insectivorous swallows are known to forage over water, but it is unclear whether swallows exhibit greater selection for wetlands relative to other habitats in croplands and grasslands. Central-place foraging theory suggests that habitat selectivity should increase with traveling distance from a central place, such that foragers compensate for traveling costs by selecting more profitable foraging habitat. Using global positioning system (GPS) tags, we evaluated habitat selection by female Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) at 4 sites containing wetlands and where terrestrial land cover was dominated by grasslands (grass, herbaceous cover) and/or cultivated cropland. We also used sweep-net transects to assess the abundance and biomass of flying insects in different habitats available to swallows (wetland pond margins, grassy field margins, and representative uplands). As expected for a central-place forager, GPS-tagged swallows selected more for wetland ponds (disproportionate to availability), and appeared to increasingly select for wetlands with increasing distance from their nests. On cropland-dominated sites, insect abundance and biomass tended to be higher in pond margins or grassy field margins compared to cropped uplands, while abundance and biomass were more uniform among sampled habitats at sites dominated by grass and herbaceous cover. Swallow habitat selection was not clearly explained by the distribution of sampled insects among habitats; however, traditional terrestrial sampling methods may not adequately reflect prey distribution and availability to aerially foraging swallows. Overall, our results underscore the importance of protecting and enhancing prairie wetlands and other non-crop habitats in agricultural landscapes, given their disproportionate use and capacity to support breeding swallow and insect populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document