Neuronal coding of azimuthai sound direction in the auditory midbrain of the pigeon

1988 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 470-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Lewald
1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 3060-3074 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Wubbels ◽  
N.A.M. Schellart

Wubbels, R. J. and N.A.M. Schellart. Neuronal encoding of sound direction in the auditory midbrain of the rainbow trout. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 3060–3074, 1997. Acoustical stimulation causes displacement of the sensory hair cells relative to the otoliths of the fish inner ear. The swimbladder, transforming the acoustical pressure component into displacement, also contributes to the displacement of the hair cells. Together, this (generally) yields elliptical displacement orbits. Alternative mechanisms of fish directional hearing are proposed by the phase model, which requires a temporal neuronal code, and by the orbit model, which requires a spike density code. We investigated whether the directional selective response of auditory neurons in the midbrain torus semicircularis (TS; homologous to the inferior colliculus) is based on spike density and/or temporal encoding. Rainbow trout were mounted on top of a vibrating table that was driven in the horizontal plane to simulate sound source direction. Rectilinear and elliptical (or circular) motion was applied at 172 Hz. Generally, responses to rectilinear and elliptical/circular stimuli (irrespective of direction of revolution) were the same. The response of auditory neurons was either directionally selective (DS units, n = 85) or not (non-DS units, n = 106). The average spontaneous discharge rate of DS units was less than that of non-DS units. Most DS units (70%) had spontaneous activities <1 spike per second. Response latencies (mode at 18 ms) were similar for both types of units. The response of DS units is transient (19%), sustained (34%), or mixed (47%). The response of 75% of the DS units synchronized to stimulus frequency, whereas just 23% of the non-DS responses did. Synchronized responses were measured at stimulus amplitudes as low as 0.5 nm (at 172 Hz), which is much lower than for auditory neurons in the medulla of the trout, suggesting strong convergence of VIIIth nerve input. The instant of firing of 42% of the units was independent of stimulus direction (shift <15°), but for the other units, a direction dependent phase shift was observed. In the medial TS spatial tuning of DS units is in the rostrocaudal direction, whereas in the lateral TS all preferred directions are present. On average, medial DS units have a broader directional selectivity range, are less often synchronized, and show a smaller shift of the instant of firing as a function of stimulus direction than lateral DS units. DS response characteristics are discussed in relation to different hypotheses. We conclude that the results are more in favor of the phase model.


2005 ◽  
Vol 84 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Reuter ◽  
A Stan ◽  
M Lenarz ◽  
G Paasche ◽  
U Reich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

The Oxford Handbook of the Auditory Brainstem provides an in-depth reference to the organization and function of ascending and descending auditory pathways in the mammalian brainstem. Individual chapters are organized along the auditory pathway, beginning with the cochlea and ending with the auditory midbrain. Each chapter provides an introduction to the respective area and summarizes our current knowledge before discussing the disputes and challenges that the field currently faces.The handbook emphasizes the numerous forms of plasticity that are increasingly observed in many areas of the auditory brainstem. Several chapters focus on neuronal modulation of function and plasticity on the synaptic, neuronal, and circuit level, especially during development, aging, and following peripheral hearing loss. In addition, the book addresses the role of trauma-induced maladaptive plasticity with respect to its contribution in generating central hearing dysfunction, such as hyperacusis and tinnitus.The book is intended for students and postdoctoral fellows starting in the auditory field and for researchers of related fields who wish to get an authoritative and up-to-date summary of the current state of auditory brainstem research. For clinical practitioners in audiology, otolaryngology, and neurology, the book is a valuable resource of information about the neuronal mechanisms that are currently discussed as major candidates for the generation of central hearing dysfunction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Lohse ◽  
Johannes C. Dahmen ◽  
Victoria M. Bajo ◽  
Andrew J. King

AbstractIntegration of information across the senses is critical for perception and is a common property of neurons in the cerebral cortex, where it is thought to arise primarily from corticocortical connections. Much less is known about the role of subcortical circuits in shaping the multisensory properties of cortical neurons. We show that stimulation of the whiskers causes widespread suppression of sound-evoked activity in mouse primary auditory cortex (A1). This suppression depends on the primary somatosensory cortex (S1), and is implemented through a descending circuit that links S1, via the auditory midbrain, with thalamic neurons that project to A1. Furthermore, a direct pathway from S1 has a facilitatory effect on auditory responses in higher-order thalamic nuclei that project to other brain areas. Crossmodal corticofugal projections to the auditory midbrain and thalamus therefore play a pivotal role in integrating multisensory signals and in enabling communication between different sensory cortical areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document