Earthquake magnitude or seismic moment in seismic hazard evaluation?

1988 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios N. Stavrakakis
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Seismic Moment ◽  
Earthquake Magnitude ◽  
Hazard Evaluation ◽  
Seismic Hazard Evaluation

Seismic Hazard Evaluation Using Markov Chains: Application to the Japan Area

2005 ◽  
Vol 162 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 1347-1366 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Alejandro Nava ◽  
Claudia Herrera ◽  
José Frez ◽  
Ewa Glowacka
Keyword(s):  
Markov Chains ◽  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Evaluation ◽  
Seismic Hazard Evaluation

scholarly journals ALGERIAN NORTHWESTERN SEISMIC HAZARD EVALUATION BASED ON THE MARKOV MODEL

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-125
Author(s):  
Badreddine Dahmoune ◽  
Hamidi Mansour
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Markov Model ◽  
Hazard Evaluation ◽  
Seismic Hazard Evaluation

Updated seismotectonic zoning scheme of Metropolitan France, with reference to geologic and seismotectonic data

2013 ◽  
Vol 184 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Baize ◽  
Edward Marc Cushing ◽  
Francis Lemeille ◽  
Hervé Jomard
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Assessment ◽  
Active Faults ◽  
Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Tectonic Activity ◽  
Hazard Evaluation ◽  
Boundary Location ◽  
Seismotectonic Zones ◽  
Seismic Hazard Evaluation ◽  
Surface Geology

Abstract This work presents the seismotectonic zoning scheme of Metropolitan France developed by the IRSN (French Institute for Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety) within the framework of its seismic hazard assessment activities. It is the outcome of many years of work following the publication of the “seismotectonic atlas” in 1993 [Grellet et al., 1993]. This scheme supports the assessment of seismic hazard by IRSN. It takes into account the most recent data concerning the deep and surface geology, as well as those related to seismotectonics and tectonic activity. It finally includes 67 surface seismotectonic zones (STZ), as well as a catalogue of 74 faults or structures (named hereafter “potential active faults”) for which indications of Neogene to Quaternary displacement can be inferred. The description of the zoning scheme comes along with an estimation of the uncertainty on the boundary location between adjacent STZ. We also qualitatively determine a “relevance order” for each limit, so as to illustrate their reliability to separate regions of different seismogenic potential. Also, we attributed to the faults an indication whose purpose is to reflect the recent character of their activity, and thus their seismotectonic potential. This assessment of uncertainties was undertaken to better integrate the zoning scheme in the general approach, which arises from recent studies, namely the propagation of the uncertainties in seismic hazard evaluation, whether deterministic or probabilistic.

scholarly journals A methodology of probabilistic seismic hazard evaluation and sensitivity study.

1991 ◽  
pp. 143-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsumi EBISAWA ◽  
Michio TAKANI ◽  
Toshiaki TANAKA ◽  
Kiyoharu ABE
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Sensitivity Study ◽  
Hazard Evaluation ◽  
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard ◽  
Seismic Hazard Evaluation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document