Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias.

1990 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 409-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey P. Kramer ◽  
Norbert L. Kerr ◽  
John S. Carroll
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Wiener ◽  
Stacie Nichols
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 527 ◽  
Author(s):  
WILLIAM DOUGLAS WOODY

1996 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan L. Freedman ◽  
Tara M. Burke
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Weeks

Soft law is a pervasive phenomenon which is highly effective as a means of regulation in Australia, as it is in many other jurisdictions. This article will not focus on the regulatory aspects of soft law, but will examine the capacity of individuals to obtain remedies where public authorities fail to adhere to the terms of their published soft law. The available judicial remedies apply in very limited circumstances, both in private law actions (in tort or equity) and public law (judicial review) actions. Ultimately, the most effective ways to remedy breaches of soft law appear also to be ‘soft’, such as recommendations of the Ombudsman and discretionary schemes for ex gratia payments.


1994 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sir John Laws
Keyword(s):  

1984 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila R. Deitz ◽  
Peter L. Sissman
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document