Anatomical basis of splenorenal anastomosis via the retroperitoneal approach

1985 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-231
Author(s):  
Y. Heloury ◽  
J. Leborgne ◽  
M. Tazi ◽  
R. Robert ◽  
J. M. Rogez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retroperitoneal Approach ◽  
Anatomical Basis

450: Extrapleural Retroperitoneal Approach for Isolated Retrocrural Metastatic Testis Cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 146-146
Author(s):  
Alan C. McCool ◽  
Karen M. Rieger ◽  
Ken A. Kessler ◽  
Richard S. Foster
Keyword(s):  
Retroperitoneal Approach ◽  
Testis Cancer

Anatomical Basis of Learning Disabilities

1985 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-314
Author(s):  
Brain Specialization ◽  
Thomas L. Kemper
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Anatomical Basis

Controversies in Managing of Thoracic-Lumbar Upper Burst Fractures

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahat Edison Sitorus
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Surgical Decompression ◽  
Neurologic Deficit ◽  
Retroperitoneal Approach ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Lateral Fixation

Upper burst fracture of Th12-L1 has unique anatomy because it contains lower spinal cord, medullary cone, and diaphragm which separates between the thoracic and lumbar spine.The presence or absence of neurologic deficit is the single most important factor in the decision making. The presence of profound but incomplete neural deficit in association with canal compromise represents an urgent indication of surgical decompression. Antero-lateral direct decompression with trans-thoracic trans-pleural–retroperitoneal approach given the proximity the cord and conus is the most effective method, with inter-vertebral instrumentation with or without lateral fixation or posterior instrumentation.

Anatomical Basis for Seed Shattering in Kleingrass and Guineagrass 1

Crop Science ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 747-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byron L. Burson ◽  
Jairo Correa ◽  
Howard C. Potts
Keyword(s):  
Seed Shattering ◽  
Anatomical Basis

Aetiologies and anatomy of confabulation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armin Schnider
Keyword(s):  
Brain Damage ◽  
Limbic Encephalitis ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Anterior Communicating Artery ◽  
Brain Areas ◽  
Anatomical Basis ◽  
Korsakoff Syndrome ◽  
Hypoxic Brain ◽  
Degenerative Dementia ◽  
The Brain

What diseases cause confabulations and which are the brain areas whose damage is responsible? This chapter reviews the causes, both historic and present, of confabulations and deduces the anatomo-clinical relationships for the four forms of confabulation in the following disorders: alcoholic Korsakoff syndrome, traumatic brain injury, rupture of an anterior communicating artery aneurysm, posterior circulation stroke, herpes and limbic encephalitis, hypoxic brain damage, degenerative dementia, tumours, schizophrenia, and syphilis. Overall, clinically relevant confabulation is rare. Some aetiologies have become more important over time, others have virtually disappeared. While confabulations seem to be more frequent after anterior brain damage, only one form has a distinct anatomical basis.

Resection of Pontine Cavernoma Through the Anterior Transpetrosal Approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo A S Kadri ◽  
Walid I B N Essayed ◽  
Ossama Al-Mefty
Keyword(s):  
Brain Stem ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Venous Angioma ◽  
Temporal Muscle ◽  
Anterior Transpetrosal Approach ◽  
Anatomical Basis ◽  
Direct Exposure ◽  
Brainstem Cavernoma ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Available Technology

Abstract The pons is the most frequent local for brain stem cavernoma.1 Repeated hemorrhage of brainstem cavernoma is associated with significant and accumulative neurological deficits and thus requires treatment. According to the Swedish Karolinska’s group of radiosurgery, ”it could not be concluded whether GKRS affects the natural course of a CM. The incidence of radiation-induced complications was approximately seven times higher than that expected.”2 Thus, microsurgical removal has become the mainstay of treatment. In our experience, the following details assist in obtaining favorable outcomes and avoiding postoperative complications3,4: (a) the entry into the cavernoma based on thorough knowledge of the microanatomy; (b) the detailed study of the images and the presentation of the cavernoma on or near the brain stem surface; (c) the resection of the live cavernous hemangioma and not the mere removal of the multiple aged organized hematomas; (d) the preservation of the associated venous angioma; (e) the direct and shortest access to the lesion provided by a skull base approach; and (f) the use of the available technology, such as intraoperative neuromonitoring and neuroimaging. We present the case of a 54-yr-old male with recent deterioration in year 2001, past repetitive episodes of gait imbalance, and speech difficulty over a 7-yr period from known pontine cavernoma. The anterior petrosal approach provided superb and direct exposure to the entry at the lateral pons and the cavernoma was totally removed with preservation of the venous angioma. His preoperative neurological deficit rapidly recovered. Patient consented to the procedure and photography. Images at 3:15 from Kadri et al, The anatomical basis for surgical presercation of temporal muscle. J Neurosurg. 2004;100:517-522, used with permission from JNSPG. Image at 3:27 from Al-Mefty O, Operative Atlas of Meningiomas, © LWW, 1997, with permission.

Anatomical basis for ultrasound-guided infiltration of the saphenous nerve in the subsartorial canal

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Lecigne ◽  
Pierre-Xavier Dubreil ◽  
Eric Berton ◽  
Mickaël Ropars ◽  
Danoob Dalili ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Nerve ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Anatomical Basis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document