Improvement of Sleep Quality after Surgical Decompression in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Background Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy which can cause severe sleep disturbance. Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a choice for severe cases, which has shown to improve sleep quality, but the available evidence is limited. This study aimed to investigate the impact of CTR on sleep quality and hand symptoms and functions in patients with CTS. Methods This was a prospective study in 2019–2020 on patients with CTS and poor sleep quality undergoing CTR. Patients were evaluated before and at 1, 3, and 12 months after CTR by the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaires. Results There were 33 patients with 27 females (82%) and a median age of 51 years. The median time of CTS diagnosis and having sleep disorder before CTR were 12 and 6 months, respectively. The outcomes significantly improved after CTR, with the median PSQI and Boston symptom and function scores reduced from 12, 33, and 23 before CTR to 9, 14, and 11 at 1 month; 7, 13, and 9 at 3 months; and 1, 11, and 8 at 12 months postoperatively, respectively. The correlations between the PSQI and Boston symptom and function scores were > 0.6 at all time-points. Conclusions Surgical decompression significantly improves sleep quality and the hand symptoms and functions in patients with CTS. Long-term evaluations are lacking and thus are required in future studies.

Functional outcome assessment for surgical decompression of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Background: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is one of the most common dysfunctions of spinal cord occurs due to degenerative changes in cervical spine disc and facet joints. It is a form of progressive spine disease including herniated disc and spinal cord stenosis which manifests as changes in gait, skilled hand movements, muscle strength, bladder dysfunction etc. Recent studies and trials have established that surgical decompression of cervical spinal is a cost-effective treatment modality which provide satisfactory functional recovery. This study aimed at the functional outcome of surgical decompression of CSM.Methods: The prospective study of 100 cases of cervical myelopathy for which decompressive surgery was done from August 2020 to August 2021. Results were analysed according to Nuricks and modified Japanese orthopedic association scoring system (MJOA).Results: Seventy one males and 29 females were included in this study with average age was 53 and average hospital stay was 3.55 days. Average pre-op Nurick score was 1.93, while score after 6 months and 1year were 1.44 and 1.15respectively. Average pre-op MJOA score was 13.63, while score after 6 months and 1 year were 14.58 and 15.74 respectively.Conclusions: The functional results of decompressive surgeries for cervical myelopathy are satisfactory. Both anterior and posterior approaches are recommended for multiple cervical myelopathy with comparable outcomes. DM and age was observed as the independent predictor for functional outcome, while, gender and level of disease got less significant predictive value.

Surgical decompression of an accessory bicipital aponeurosis associated with median neuropathy in the antecubital fossa: A case report

Background: Accessory muscles in the arm are well-known anatomical variants which have been hypothesized as sources of neurovascular compression syndromes. We report a rare presentation of neuropathy secondary to an accessory biceps aponeurosis causing compression of the median nerve in the antecubital fossa. Case Description: A 65-year-old man presented with a 5-year history of numbness and pain associated with arm flexion. Electromyography was normal and exam revealed mild weakness in the median nerve distribution; however, magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated an accessory biceps tendon overlaying the median nerve in the antecubital fossa. The patient underwent surgical decompression of the median nerve with detachment of the accessory tendon resulting in clinical improvement. Conclusion: Anomalous biceps musculature should be considered in the workup and treatment of proximal median neuropathy.

Abdominal Compartment Syndrome—When is Surgical Decompression Needed?

Compartment syndrome occurs when increased pressure inside a closed anatomical space compromises tissue perfusion. The sudden increase in pressure inside these spaces requires rapid decompression by means of surgical intervention. In the case of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), surgical decompression consists of a laparostomy. The aim of this review is to identify the landmarks and indications for the appropriate moment to perform decompression laparotomy in patients with ACS based on available published data. A targeted literature review was conducted on indications for decompression laparotomy in ACS. The search was focused on three conditions characterized by a high ACS prevalence, namely acute pancreatitis, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and severe burns. There is still a debate around the clinical characteristics which require surgical intervention in ACS. According to the limited data published from observational studies, laparotomy is usually performed when intra-abdominal pressure reaches values ranging from 25 to 36 mmHg on average in the case of acute pancreatitis. In cases of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, there is a higher urgency to perform decompression laparotomy for ACS due to the possibility of continuous hemorrhage. The most conflicting recommendations on whether surgical treatment should be delayed in favor of other non-surgical interventions come from studies involving patients with severe burns. The results of the review must be interpreted in the context of the limited available robust data from observational studies and clinical trials.

Concurrent decompression and resection versus decompression with delayed resection of acutely ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations

OBJECTIVE Brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) most commonly present with rupture and intraparenchymal hemorrhage. In rare cases, the hemorrhage is large enough to cause clinical herniation or intractable intracranial hypertension. Patients in these cases require emergent surgical decompression as a life-saving measure. The surgeon must decide whether to perform concurrent or delayed resection of the bAVM. Theoretical benefits to concurrent resection include a favorable operative corridor created by the hematoma, avoiding a second surgery, and more rapid recovery and rehabilitation. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical and surgical outcomes of patients who had undergone concurrent emergent decompression and bAVM resection with those of patients who had undergone delayed bAVM resection. METHODS The authors conducted a 15-year retrospective review of consecutive patients who had undergone microsurgical resection of a ruptured bAVM at their institution. Patients presenting in clinical herniation or with intractable intracranial hypertension were included and grouped according to the timing of bAVM resection: concurrent with decompression (hyperacute group) or separate resection surgery after decompression (delayed group). Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Groups were compared in terms of the primary outcomes of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) lengths of stay (LOSs). Secondary outcomes included complete obliteration (CO), Glasgow Coma Scale score, and modified Rankin Scale score at discharge and at the most recent follow-up. RESULTS A total of 35/269 reviewed patients met study inclusion criteria; 18 underwent concurrent decompression and resection (hyperacute group) and 17 patients underwent emergent decompression only with later resection of the bAVM (delayed group). Hyperacute and delayed groups differed only in the proportion that underwent preresection endovascular embolization (16.7% vs 76.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the hyperacute and delayed groups in hospital LOS (26.1 vs 33.2 days, respectively; p = 0.93) or ICU LOS (10.6 vs 16.1 days, respectively; p = 0.69). Rates of CO were also comparable (78% vs 88%, respectively; p > 0.99). Medical complications were similar in the two groups (33% hyperacute vs 41% delayed, p > 0.99). Short-term clinical outcomes were better for the delayed group based on mRS score at discharge (4.2 vs 3.2, p < 0.05); however, long-term outcomes were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Ruptured bAVM rarely presents in clinical herniation requiring surgical decompression and hematoma evacuation. Concurrent surgical decompression and resection of a ruptured bAVM can be performed on low-grade lesions without compromising LOS or long-term functional outcome; however, the surgeon may encounter a more challenging surgical environment.