The circulation in liver tissue and experimental liver metastases before and after embolization of the liver artery

1977 ◽  
Vol 171 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Lindell ◽  
Karl Fredrik Aronsen ◽  
Ulf Rothman ◽  
Hans O. Sjögren
1985 ◽  
Vol 185 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Merkel ◽  
P. P. Cagol ◽  
P. P. Da Pian ◽  
M. Bolognesi ◽  
D. Sacerdoti ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Michelle Steicke ◽  
Guang Yang ◽  
Tam Nguyen Dinh ◽  
Matthew Dunster-Jones ◽  
Owen Sargisson ◽  
...  

Methanol, ethanol and formalin are commonly used as fixatives to preserve biological tissues from decay in the preparation of histological sections. Fixation of the inner layers of the tissue depends on the ability of the fixative to diffuse into the tissue. It is unknown whether methanol penetrates tissues at similar rates to other fixatives. This study aimed to compare the penetration rates of methanol, ethanol and formalin into bovine heart and liver tissues. The penetration distance and tissue shrinkage or expansion were measured by analysing the digital images of tissue before and after immersion in different fixatives for 1, 2, 6 or 10 h. Data were analysed using two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test. The penetration distance of methanol was significantly greater in both heart and liver tissues compared with that of ethanol (N=4, P<0.001). Methanol or ethanol immersion led to similar shrinkage of both tissues (P>0.05). The penetration rate of formalin was similar to that of ethanol in both tissues however it was significantly slower than methanol (N=4, P<0.005 in the heart; P<0.001 in the liver). The mean penetration coefficients of methanol, formalin and ethanol in the heart tissue were 2.609, 1.994 and 1.801, respectively, and 3.012, 2.153 and 2.113, respectively, in the liver tissue. The penetration coefficient of methanol was significantly greater than that of ethanol or formalin in both tissues (P<0.001 for each comparison). In conclusion, methanol penetrates tissue significantly faster than ethanol and formalin.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanping Zhang ◽  
Yongjin Wang ◽  
Yichuan Yuan ◽  
Jiliang Qiu ◽  
Yuxiong Qiu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Whether primary tumor location of colorectal cancer (CRC) affects survival of patients after resection of liver metastases remains controversial. This study was conducted to investigate the differences in clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis between right-sided CRC and left-sided CRC patients with liver metastases after hepatectomy. Methods: From 2002 to 2018, 611 patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent hepatectomy at our center were reviewed. Primary tumors located from cecum to transverse colon were defined as right-sided group (n = 141); tumors located from splenic flexure to rectum were defined as left-sided group (n = 470). Patients were compared between two groups before and after a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Results: Before PSM, median survival time and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in right-sided group were 77 months and 56.3%, and those in left-sided group were 64 months and 51.1%, respectively. After PSM, median survival time and 5-year OS rate in right-sided group were 77 months and 55.9%, and those in left-sided group were 58.8 months and 47.3%, respectively. The OS rates did not differ between two groups before and after PSM (P = 0.575; P = 0.453). However, significant different recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was found before and after PSM between right-sided and left-sided group (P = 0.028, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Compared to patients with left-sided primary tumors, patients with right-sided primary tumors had a worse RFS but similar OS. Careful preoperative evaluation, intensive preoperative chemotherapy and frequent follow-up to detect early recurrence might be justified for CRLM patients with right-sided primary tumors.


2002 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Karube ◽  
Hideki Masuda ◽  
Yukimoto Ishii ◽  
Tadatoshi Takayama

1994 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koert P. Dingemans ◽  
Marius A. van den Bergh Weerman ◽  
Robert F. Keep ◽  
Pranab K. Das

2010 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 413-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne E.M. van der Pool ◽  
Zarina S. Lalmahomed ◽  
Johannes H.W. de Wilt ◽  
Alexander M.M. Eggermont ◽  
Jan N.M. Ijzermans ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document