Bousfield localization as an algebraic closure of groups

1989 ◽  
Vol 66 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 143-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Dror Farjoun ◽  
K. Orr ◽  
S. Shelah
2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (S239) ◽  
pp. 77-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian W Roxburgh ◽  
Friedrich Kupka

AbstractWe investigate the properties of non-local Reynolds stress models of turbulent convection in a spherical geometry. Regularity at the centre r=0 places constraints on the behaviour of 3rd order moments. Some of the down-gradient and algebraic closure models have inconsistent behaviour at r=0. A combination of down-gradient and algebraic closures gives a consistent prescription that can be used to model convection in stellar cores.


2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 1057-1066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Özlem Beyarslan ◽  
Ehud Hrushovski

AbstractWe study the automorphism group of the algebraic closure of a substructureAof a pseudo-finite fieldF. We show that the behavior of this group, even whenAis large, depends essentially on the roots of unity inF. For almost all completions of the theory of pseudofinite fields, we show that overA, algebraic closure agrees with definable closure, as soon asAcontains the relative algebraic closure of the prime field.


1989 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 571-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Levine

2016 ◽  
Vol 224 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAY TAYLOR

Let $\mathbf{G}$ be a connected reductive algebraic group over an algebraic closure $\overline{\mathbb{F}_{p}}$ of the finite field of prime order $p$ and let $F:\mathbf{G}\rightarrow \mathbf{G}$ be a Frobenius endomorphism with $G=\mathbf{G}^{F}$ the corresponding $\mathbb{F}_{q}$-rational structure. One of the strongest links we have between the representation theory of $G$ and the geometry of the unipotent conjugacy classes of $\mathbf{G}$ is a formula, due to Lusztig (Adv. Math. 94(2) (1992), 139–179), which decomposes Kawanaka’s Generalized Gelfand–Graev Representations (GGGRs) in terms of characteristic functions of intersection cohomology complexes defined on the closure of a unipotent class. Unfortunately, the formula given in Lusztig (Adv. Math. 94(2) (1992), 139–179) is only valid under the assumption that $p$ is large enough. In this article, we show that Lusztig’s formula for GGGRs holds under the much milder assumption that $p$ is an acceptable prime for $\mathbf{G}$ ($p$ very good is sufficient but not necessary). As an application we show that every irreducible character of $G$, respectively, character sheaf of $\mathbf{G}$, has a unique wave front set, respectively, unipotent support, whenever $p$ is good for $\mathbf{G}$.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document