Types of massive sulphide deposits in the Urals

1998 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Prokin ◽  
F. P. Buslaev ◽  
A. P. Nasedkin
2012 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 5-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.V. Maslennikov ◽  
N.R. Ayupova ◽  
R.J. Herrington ◽  
L.V. Danyushevskiy ◽  
R.R. Large

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-22
Author(s):  
I. B. Seravkin ◽  
A. M. Kosarev

A comparative paleovolcanic and metallogenic analysis of two massive-sulphide-bearing regions, the Southern Urals and Ore Altai, located in different parts of the Ural-Mongolian folded belt, was performed. Comparison of the geodynamic evolution of these areas, the formation and facies composition of the ore-bearing strata and types of massive-sulphide deposits has led to the conclusion that the regions are similar only in the most general terms. Fundamental differences in the structure and composition of the crust of the regions led to differences in the profile of island-arc magmatism: basaltoid in the Southern Urals and rhyolitoid in Ore Altai. This, in its turn, determined the predominant composition of massive-sulphide mineralization: copper-zinc in the first of the regions and polymetallic — in the second. Opposite tendencies in the evolution of volcanism are also characteristic: homodromic in the Southern Urals and antidromic in the Ore Altai, which resulted in a different position of the types of massive-sulphide deposits in the ore districts: the bottom-up change of copper — massive-sulphide deposits by the massive-sulphide -polymetallic in the Southern Urals and barite polymetallic by massive-sulphide polymetallic and copper- massive-sulphide in the Ore Altai. Significant differences are also in the lateral distribution patterns of mineralization: a more pronounced control of mineralization by paleovolcanic structures of the central type in the Southern Urals and the frequent position of mineralization in intermediate and remote facies of volcanism in the Ore Altai, which is reflected in the prevalence of volcanic sections in the Urals and the majority of the volcanic sections and the larger majority of the volcanic rocks in the Ore Altai, which is reflected in the prevalence of volcanic rocks in the Urals and the majority of the volcanic sections and in the Ore Altai most of the volcanic minerals and the larger majority of the mineral rocks (20–80%) in the strata containing mineralization in the Ore Altai.


2017 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 30-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya V. Vikentyev ◽  
Elena V. Belogub ◽  
Konstantin A. Novoselov ◽  
Vasily P. Moloshag

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 22-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana G. Tessalina ◽  
Richard J. Herrington ◽  
Rex N. Taylor ◽  
Krister Sundblad ◽  
Valery V. Maslennikov ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 481-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. M. DeWolfe ◽  
H. L. Gibson ◽  
B. Lafrance ◽  
A. H. Bailes

The hanging wall to the Flin Flon, Callinan, and Triple 7 volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits of the Flin Flon district is composed of the Hidden and Louis formations. The contact between these formations is marked by mafic tuff that represents a hiatus in effusive volcanism. The formations form a composite volcanic edifice that was erupted and grew within a large, volcanic–tectonic subsidence structure (hosting the deposits) that developed within a rifted-arc environment. The formations are evidence of resurgent effusive volcanism and subsidence following a hiatus in volcanism marked by ore formation since they consist of dominantly basaltic flows, sills, and volcaniclastic rocks with subordinate basaltic andesite and rhyodacitic flows and volcaniclastic rocks. The Hidden formation is interpreted to represent a small shield volcano and the Louis formation a separate shield volcano that developed on its flank. Both the Hidden and Louis volcanic edifices were constructed by continuous, low-volume eruptions of pillow lava. A gradual change from a dominantly extensional environment during the formation of the footwall Flin Flon formation to a progressively more dominant convergent environment during the emplacement of the hanging wall suggests that the Hidden and Louis formations are unlikely to host significant volcanogenic massive sulphide-type mineralization. However, synvolcanic structures in the formations define structural corridors that project downwards into the footwall where they encompass massive sulphide mineralization, indicating their control on ore formation, longevity,and reactivation as magma and fluid pathways during the growth of the Hidden and Louis volcanoes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document