ACL substitution may improve kinematics of PCL-retaining total knee arthroplasty

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1445-1454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Zumbrunn ◽  
Michael P. Duffy ◽  
Harry E. Rubash ◽  
Henrik Malchau ◽  
Orhun K. Muratoglu ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 798-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshio Onishi ◽  
Kazunori Hino ◽  
Seiji Watanabe ◽  
Kunihiko Watamori ◽  
Tatsuhiko Kutsuna ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip M. Faris ◽  
Merrill A. Ritter ◽  
Thomas J. Aleto ◽  
Andrew L. Pierce

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 2002-2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinori Ishii ◽  
Hideo Noguchi ◽  
Mitsuhiro Takeda ◽  
Junko Sato ◽  
Shin-ichi Toyabe

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merrill A. Ritter ◽  
Kenneth E. Davis ◽  
Alex Farris ◽  
E. Michael Keating ◽  
Philip M. Faris

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
KY Chiu ◽  
TP Ng ◽  
WM Tang ◽  
WP Yau

Many factors affect or predict the flexion range achieved after total knee arthroplasty. While the knees that have good preoperative flexion have better final flexion, knees with good preoperative flexion do lose some flexion whereas those with poor preoperative flexion can gain flexion. Although studies of different prosthetic designs have produced conflicting results, recent studies appear to favour posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)—substituting over PCL-retaining prostheses. Several factors related to surgical techniques have been found to be important. These include the tightness of the retained posterior cruciate ligament, the elevation of the joint line, increased patellar thickness, and a trapezoidal flexion gap. Vigorous rehabilitation after surgery appears useful, while continuous passive motion has not been found to be effective. Obesity and previous surgery are poor prognostic factors; certain cultural factors, such as the Japanese style of sitting, offer ‘unintentional’ passive flexion and result in patients with better range. If the flexion after surgery is unsatisfactory, manipulation under anaesthesia within 3 months of the total knee arthroplasty can be beneficial.


2009 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 254-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Chouteau ◽  
J.-L. Lerat ◽  
R. Testa ◽  
B. Moyen ◽  
M.-H. Fessy ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Robert Brochin ◽  
Jashvant Poeran ◽  
Khushdeep S. Vig ◽  
Aakash Keswani ◽  
Nicole Zubizarreta ◽  
...  

AbstractGiven increasing demand for primary knee arthroplasties, revision surgery is also expected to increase, with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) a main driver of costs. Recent data on national trends is lacking. We aimed to assess trends in PJI in total knee arthroplasty revisions and hospitalization costs. From the National Inpatient Sample (2003–2016), we extracted data on total knee arthroplasty revisions (n = 782,449). We assessed trends in PJI prevalence and (inflation-adjusted) hospitalization costs (total as well as per-day costs) for all revisions and stratified by hospital teaching status (rural/urban by teaching status), hospital bed size (≤299, 300–499, and ≥500 beds), and hospital region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West). The Cochran–Armitage trend test (PJI prevalence) and linear regression determined significance of trends. PJI prevalence overall was 25.5% (n = 199,818) with a minor increasing trend: 25.3% (n = 7,828) in 2003 to 28.9% (n = 19,275) in 2016; p < 0.0001. Median total hospitalization costs for PJI decreased slightly ($23,247 in 2003–$20,273 in 2016; p < 0.0001) while median per-day costs slightly increased ($3,452 in 2003–$3,727 in 2016; p < 0.0001), likely as a function of decreasing length of stay. With small differences between hospitals, the lowest and highest PJI prevalences were seen in small (≤299 beds; 22.9%) and urban teaching hospitals (27.3%), respectively. In stratification analyses, an increasing trend in PJI prevalence was particularly seen in larger (≥500 beds) hospitals (24.4% in 2003–30.7% in 2016; p < 0.0001), while a decreasing trend was seen in small-sized hospitals. Overall, PJI in knee arthroplasty revisions appears to be slightly increasing. Moreover, increasing trends in large hospitals and decreasing trends in small-sized hospitals suggest a shift in patients from small to large volume hospitals. Decreasing trends in total costs, alongside increasing trends in per-day costs, suggest a strong impact of length of stay trends and a more efficient approach to PJI over the years (in terms of shorter length of stay).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document