Do urodynamic parameters predict persistent postoperative stress incontinence after midurethral sling? A systematic review

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 813-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amie Kawasaki ◽  
Jennifer M. Wu ◽  
Cindy L. Amundsen ◽  
Alison C. Weidner ◽  
John P. Judd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Stress Incontinence ◽  
Midurethral Sling ◽  
Postoperative Stress ◽  
Urodynamic Parameters

scholarly journals Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) and Adjustable Continence Therapy (ProACT) for male stress incontinence

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. e0225762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier C. Angulo ◽  
Sandra Schönburg ◽  
Alessandro Giammò ◽  
Francisco J. Abellán ◽  
Ignacio Arance ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Stress Incontinence ◽  
Meta Analysis

Risk factors of treatment failure of midurethral sling procedures for women with urinary stress incontinence

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kobi Stav ◽  
Peter L. Dwyer ◽  
Anna Rosamilia ◽  
Lore Schierlitz ◽  
Yik N. Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Stress Incontinence ◽  
Midurethral Sling ◽  
Urinary Stress Incontinence

A Midurethral Sling to Reduce Incontinence After Vaginal Repair

2021 ◽  
pp. 202-206
Author(s):  
Deepali Maheshwari ◽  
Ellen Solomon
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Midurethral Sling ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Vaginal Prolapse ◽  
Prolapse Surgery ◽  
Vaginal Repair ◽  
Vaginal Prolapse Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Stress

The OPUS (Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repair and Midurethral Sling) trial examined the effect of a prophylactic midurethral sling at the time of vaginal prolapse surgery in women without stress urinary incontinence. Women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse are at risk for developing postoperative stress urinary incontinence even if they do not complain of it preoperatively. This was a randomized controlled trial with intervention patients in the prophylactic midurethral sling group and control patients in the sham group. The authors identified a lower rate of de novo urinary incontinence at 3 and 12 months in women who received a prophylactic midurethral sling at the time of vaginal prolapse surgery. However, they also found higher rates of adverse events. This study provides valuable information for patient counseling and surgical decision-making with respect to concurrent prolapse and incontinence surgeries.

Retropubic Versus Transobturator Midurethral Slings for Stress Incontinence

2021 ◽  
pp. 221-226
Author(s):  
Giulia I. Lane ◽  
Colby A. Dixon ◽  
M. Louis Moy ◽  
Cynthia S. Fok
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Stress Incontinence ◽  
Midurethral Sling ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Midurethral Slings ◽  
Neurologic Symptoms ◽  
Retropubic Midurethral Sling ◽  
Transobturator Midurethral Sling

This chapter summarizes the results of the Trial of Mid Urethral Slings (TOMUS), in which women with stress urinary incontinence were randomized to a retropubic midurethral sling versus a transobturator sling. Bladder perforations and voiding dysfunction occurred only in the retropubic sling group; neurologic symptoms (weakness and numbness) were significantly more common in the transobturator group. Both objective and subjective measures of treatment success at 12 months were similar. Based on this and subsequent studies, retropubic and transobturator midurethral sling approaches appear to have similar outcomes at 12 months for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. However, the approaches differ in their adverse-event profiles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document