Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injection for management of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: short-term and long-term results

2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 691-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon Woo Lee ◽  
Jae Sung Myung ◽  
Kun Woo Park ◽  
Jin S. Yeom ◽  
Ki-Jeong Kim ◽  
...  
Spine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (15) ◽  
pp. 1030-1038
Author(s):  
Jakob M. Burgstaller ◽  
Johann Steurer ◽  
Isaac Gravestock ◽  
Florian Brunner ◽  
Tamás F. Fekete ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-398
Author(s):  
Waqas Noor Chughtai ◽  
Muhammad Adeel Razzaque ◽  
Tanveer Ahmad ◽  
Sumera Nighat ◽  
Bashir Ahmad ◽  
...  

Objective:  This study aimed to determine the relation of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis and pain improvement after caudal epidural injection. Material and Methods:  70 patients of neurogenic claudication were included from July 2019 to June 2020. MRI lumbosacral spine was done of all patients to categorize the degree of spinal stenosis on T2-W axial. All patients were given caudal epidural steroid injection as a day case procedure. Follow-up was done at 3 & 8 weeks and pain improvement was assessed by using Ronald satisfaction score. Results:  Mean age was 37.9 ± 7.8 years. 48.6% patients were male and 51.6% were female. The improvement was observed in 28 patients (40%) at 3 weeks and in 46 patients (65.7%) at 8 weeks. There  was no  statistically significant  relationship between  lumbar spinal stenosis and pain improvements at 3 weeks (p value 0.30) and 8 weeks (p value 0.32). Conclusion:  The grade of lumbar spinal stenosis has no significant effect on pain improvement after caudal epidural steroid injection. Keywords:  LSS (Lumbar spinal stenosis), caudal epidural steroid injection (ESI), neurogenic claudication, MRI (Magnetic resonance imaging), T2W (T2 weighted) images.


2007 ◽  
Vol 4;10 (7;4) ◽  
pp. 558-558
Author(s):  
Kenneth P. Botwin

Background: Caudal epidural steroid injections are commonly utilized to help reduce radicular pain in lumbar spinal stenosis. There have been studies done to evaluate the effectiveness of this procedure non-fluoroscopically guided. Search revealed no prospective studies evaluating the effectiveness of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections on patients with bilateral radicular pain from degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic benefit of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections in the treatment of bilateral radicular pain from symptomatic Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (DLSS). Design: This prospective cohort study was performed on 34 patients with bilateral radicular pain from lumbar spinal stenosis who received fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections at a multidisciplinary spine center as they did not improve with conservative care. The patients’ degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and classified as mild, moderate, or severe. The patients were evaluated by an independent observer and completed questionnaires, prior to initial injection, at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after the injections. Outcome Measures: Visual analog scale, patient satisfaction scale, standing/walking tolerance scale and Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Results: A total of 34 patients met our inclusion criteria and were followed at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Sixty-five percent of patients at 6 weeks, 62% at 6 months, and 54% at 12 months had a successful outcome, reporting at least a >50% reduction between pre-injection and post injection visual analog pain scores. Fifty nine percent of patients had an improved walking tolerance at 6 weeks (P <0.0001), 56% at 6 months (P <0.0001), and 51% at 12 months (P=0.0005). Fifty percent of patients had an improved standing tolerance at 6 weeks (P= 0.0002), 54% at 6 months (P < 0.0001), and 51% at 12 months (P=0.0005). The patient satisfaction scale revealed 64% of patients felt completely or somewhat better at 6 weeks, 59% at 6 months and 52% at 12 months. Owestry low back pain disability questionnaire scores showed statistically significant improvement from initial scores to 6 weeks (P < 0.0001), initial to 6 months (P= 0.0095), and initial to 12 months (P=0.00015). The outcome was statistically significant even in severe stenotic patients when comparing initial mean scores to 12 month mean scores in standing tolerance (P =0.2956), walking tolerance (P=0.0250), and VAS (P= 0.0199). Conclusion: Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections may help reduce bilateral radicular pain and improve standing and walking tolerance in patients with DLSS. Key words: Injections, epidural radiculopathy, lumbar spinal stenosis, rehabilitation


2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis D. Gelalis ◽  
Kosmas S. Stafilas ◽  
Anastasios V. Korompilias ◽  
Konstantinos C. Zacharis ◽  
Alexandros E. Beris ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 80 (02) ◽  
pp. 081-087
Author(s):  
Nicola Bongartz ◽  
Christian Blume ◽  
Hans Clusmann ◽  
Christian Müller ◽  
Matthias Geiger

Background To evaluate whether decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis without fusion leads to sufficient improvement of back pain and leg pain and whether re-decompression alone is sufficient for recurrent lumbar spinal stenosis for patients without signs of instability. Material and Methods A successive series of 102 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (with and without previous lumbar surgery) were treated with decompression alone during a 3-year period. Data on pre- and postoperative back pain and leg pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] scale) were retrospectively collected from questionnaires with a return rate of 65% (n = 66). The complete cohort as well as patients with first-time surgery and re-decompression were analyzed separately. Patients were dichotomized to short-term follow-up (< 100 weeks) and long-term follow-up (> 100 weeks) postsurgery. Results Overall, both back pain (NRS 4.59 postoperative versus 7.89 preoperative; p < 0.0001) and leg pain (NRS 4.09 versus 6.75; p < 0.0001) improved postoperatively. The short-term follow-up subgroup (50%, n = 33) showed a significant reduction in back pain (NRS 4.0 versus 6.88; p < 0.0001) and leg pain (NRS 2.49 versus 6.91: p < 0.0001). Similar results could be observed for the long-term follow-up subgroup (50%, n = 33) with significantly less back pain (NRS 3.94 versus 7.0; p < 0.0001) and leg pain (visual analog scale 3.14 versus 5.39; p < 0.002) postoperatively. Patients with previous decompression surgery benefit significantly regarding back pain (NRS 4.82 versus 7.65; p < 0.0024), especially in the long-term follow-up subgroup (NRS 4.75 versus 7.67; p < 0.0148). There was also a clear trend in favor of leg pain in patients with previous surgery; however, it was not significant. Conclusions Decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis without fusion led to a significant and similar reduction of back pain and leg pain in a short-term and a long-term follow-up group. Patients without previous surgery benefited significantly better, whereas patients with previous decompression benefited regarding back pain, especially for long-term follow-up with a clear trend in favor of leg pain.


2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1174-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pär Slätis ◽  
Antti Malmivaara ◽  
Markku Heliövaara ◽  
Päivi Sainio ◽  
Arto Herno ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document