Analysis of Lower Breast Pole Length and Nipple–Areola Complex Position Following Superior Pedicle, Short Horizontal Scar Breast Reduction

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 690-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozan Bitik ◽  
Hakan Uzun
2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-148
Author(s):  
N. Verhelle ◽  
B. De. Frene ◽  
K. Thaels ◽  
O. Heymans ◽  
F. Missotten

2006 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 292-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilfredo Calderon ◽  
Alex Eulufi ◽  
Claudio Borel ◽  
Patricio L??niz ◽  
Daniel Calderon

Folia Medica ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 34-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hristo Shipkov ◽  
Ali Mojallal ◽  
Fabienne Braye

ABSTRACT AIM: To present and evaluate the outcomes of the posterosuperior pedicle breast reduction technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 200 patients were included in the present retrospective study. They were operated on between January 2006 and January 2009. The mean age was 35.9 years (range 22 to 58 years). The average notch-to-nipple distance was 35.8 cm (range, 29 to 42 cm). The mean body mass index was 27 (range, 22 to 35 cm). Results were assessed by means of self-evaluation and by an independent 5-member jury. Fifty two patients (26%) had had bariatric surgery and 48 (24%) had had abdominoplasty. None of the patients had any previous breast surgery. All patients reported dorsal and cervical pain. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 16 months (range, 13 to 23 months). The average weight resected was 981 g (range from 370 g to 1800 g). The average duration of surgery was 2h (range, 1.50 to 2.30 hours) and average length of hospital stay was 2.3 days (range, 2 to 4 days). The duration of the outpatient postoperative care until complete wound healing was 15.2 days (range, 13 to 20 days). There were 4 major complications (2%) (1 bilateral and 3 unilateral infections) treated by drainage and intravenous antibiotics. Twenty-two minor complications were recorded (11%) including one desquamation of the nipple-areola complex without necrosis (0.5%) delayed healing at the junction site of the inverted T incision in 21 cases (10.5%). One hundred and forty eight patients evaluated their results as “very good” (74%), 36 as “good” (18%), and 16 as “acceptable” (8%). There were no results assessed as “poor.” Fifty-eight percent of the patients found that back pain had totally resolved versus 42% who had signifi cant improvement though not complete resolution. CONCLUSIONS: The postero-superior pedicle for breast reduction is a reproducible and versatile technique. The preservation of the anterior intercostal artery perforators enhances the reliability of the vascular supply to the superior pedicle.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Rancati ◽  
Marcelo Irigo ◽  
Claudio Angrigiani

2003 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 360-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moustapha Hamdi ◽  
Phillip Blondeel ◽  
Karlien Van de Sijpe ◽  
Koenraad Van Landuyt ◽  
Stan Monstrey

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humayun Ayub Khan ◽  
Ardeshir Bayat

Background An important part of preoperative assessment in breast reduction surgery is to locate the site of the nipple-areola complex for the newly structured breast. Inappropriate location is difficult to correct secondarily. Traditional methods of nipple localization taught and practiced suggest the nipple to be located anterior to the inframammary fold. Trying to project this point on the anterior surface of the breast requires either large calipers or feeling the posteriorly placed finger on the anterior surface of a large breast. This certainly introduces some subjectivity to the calculation. Objectives To introduce an easy and accurate method of nipple localization to reduce the learning curve for trainee surgeons. Methods Aesthetic placement of the nipples is at the lower angles of an equilateral or a short isosceles triangle on the chest with its apex at the sternal angle. This triangle can be thought of as two right-angled triangles with their Y-axis on the median plane. The base and vertical limb are measured, and the hypotenuse is calculated. The location of the lower angle is marked on the anterior surface of the breast and represents the new position of the nipple. Results Forty patients had nipple localization performed in the above-described manner, with satisfactory placement of the nipple-areola complex. Conclusions The above technique introduces some objective measurements to the localization of the nipple in breast reduction surgery. It is easy to practice, and infuses confidence in trainees marking their initial breast reductions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document