Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Current Status in the Planning and Follow-Up of Endovascular Treatment in Lower-Limb Arterial Disease

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raghuram Lakshminarayan ◽  
James O. Simpson ◽  
Duncan F. Ettles
2021 ◽  
pp. 159101992110659
Author(s):  
Young Jin Heo ◽  
Donghyun Kim ◽  
Hae Woong Jeong ◽  
Jin Wook Baek ◽  
Da Som Kim ◽  
...  

Purpose Imaging follow-up after endovascular treatment is important; however, time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) has limitations associated with magnetic susceptibility and radiofrequency shielding caused by the stent and coils. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA)-MRA after endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms. Material and methods A total of 186 patients with 211 aneurysms who underwent both pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition- and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in the same imaging session for follow-up after endovascular treatment. We subjectively graded the overall image quality, visualization of treated sites, and occlusion status. Results Although the overall image quality scores of pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition-magnetic resonance angiography were significantly lower than those of time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for both observers (4.04 ± 0.81 vs. 4.85 ± 0.35 [observer 1], 4.60 ± 0.69 vs. 4.94 ± 0.24 [observer 2]) (both P < .001), the visibility of treated sites using pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition-magnetic resonance angiography was significantly better than that of time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography overall (4.27 ± 0.97 vs. 3.42 ± 1.01; P < .001), in the distal internal carotid artery (4.46 ± 0.79 vs. 3.40 ± 1.00; P < .001), and in the middle cerebral artery (4.19 ± 0.93 vs. 3.08 ± 0.53, P = 0.007). Pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition-magnetic resonance angiography showed a higher area under the curve than time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of treated aneurysm occlusion, except for posterior circulation aneurysms. Conclusions Pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition-magnetic resonance angiography showed better visualization of treated sites and better diagnostic performance than time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for anterior circulation aneurysms. However, Pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition-magnetic resonance angiography showed limitations in the follow-up evaluation of posterior circulation aneurysms.


Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukiko Enomoto ◽  
Shinichi Yoshimura ◽  
Yusuke Egashira ◽  
Toru Iwama

Objectives: Endovascular treatment provides a therapeutic option for acute ischemic stroke patients who are ineligible for, or who do not respond to intravenous thrombolysis. Higher rates of recanalization by mechanical clot extraction device were reportedly associated with better clinical outcome, but the long-term patency of recanalized vessel is unknown. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 24-hour and 3-month after the endovascular treatment in consecutive acute stroke patients who were treated with mechanical clot extraction device between Oct. 2010 and May 2012 in our institution. Results: Fourty-six patients received endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke and 35 were treated with mechanical clot extraction devices, Merci and/or Penumbra system, with or without adjunctive therapy. Mean age was 69±12 years, baseline median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 15 (8 to 24), and occluded vessels were the internal carotid artery in 34%, middle cerebral artery (MCA) in 54%, and vertebro-basilar artery in 11%. Successful recanalization, defined as Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction II or III perfusion, was obtained in 32 (91%) patients. During 24-hour after the treatment, reocclusion of the treated vessel was observed in 4 (12.5%) patients. Of 28 eligible patients, 21 (75%) patients had 3-month MRA follow-up. None of the patients had reocclusion, but clinically silent diffuse stenosis was observed in 2 (9.5%) patients. Statistically significant predictors were not identified, but both of the patients were MCA occlusion treated with Merci retriever. Conclusion: In this study, late stenosis was observed in the MCA on 3-month follow-up MRA. Long-term follow-up seems to be useful to follow the recanalized vessels, especialy when mechanical devices were used.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vamsi Gontu ◽  
Norman McConachie

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is commonly used to follow up patients after endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms. Magnetic resonance artefacts from coil constructs may impair image quality and jeopardise the evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment and review of adjacent vasculature. We present here a technical note on the usage of Barricade coils recently introduced at our institution. The MRA artefacts associated with these coils may make it impossible to ascertain aneurysm closure and anatomy. Hence these patients would need to be recalled for digital subtraction angiograms for a complete neuroradiological follow-up.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document