Displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children: open reduction vs. closed reduction and pinning

2004 ◽  
Vol 124 (8) ◽  
pp. 547-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
G�rkan �zkoc ◽  
Ugur Gonc ◽  
Asim Kayaalp ◽  
Kursat Teker ◽  
Tulay Tuncer Peker
Keyword(s):  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Humeral Fractures ◽  
Fractures In Children ◽  
Supracondylar Humeral Fractures

Temporary Use of Skeletal Traction in Management of Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 427-436
Author(s):  
Piotr Zając ◽  
Piotr Zając
Keyword(s):  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Vascular Complications ◽  
Humeral Fractures ◽  
Percutaneous Fixation ◽  
Skeletal Traction ◽  
Fractures In Children ◽  
Wire Fixation ◽  
Supracondylar Humeral Fractures

Background. The paper presents a treatment algorithm for supracondylar humeral fractures in children, involving temporary use of skeletal traction following failure of primary closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRPF) and introducing closed reduction after management by skeletal traction. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of supracondylar humerus fracture treatment performed according to the algorithm. Material and methods. The treatment was performed in 149 children (70 girls, 79 boys) with extension-type supracondylar humeral fractures. The study group was assessed with regard to a modified Gartland classification, neurological complications (12 children, 8%) and vascular complications (8 children, 5.4%). A total of 124 (83.2%) patients underwent emergency CRPF and 24 children (16.1%) received skeletal traction after a failed CRPF. After 2-6 days, an elective repeat CRPF procedure was attempted, which was successful in 17 children. The attempt failed in the other 7 children, who received traction and underwent open reduction under a single anesthesia. One child (0.7%) with a white and pulseless hand was treated by emergency open reduction and percutaneous fixation. Results. The study used the Flynn criteria modified by the author. After 6 months, the results in the group treated with CRPF (both primary and following skeletal traction) were good in 90.8% of patients, satisfactory in 8.5%, and poor in 0.7%, whereas in the open reduction and percutaneous fixation group, the results were good in 87.5% of cases and satisfactory in 12.5%. Conclusions. 1. X-ray-guided closed reduction and percutaneous K wire fixation is a method of choice in the treatment of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children. If closed reduction fails, the surgeon is faced with a choice between primary open reduction and the use of direct traction through the olecranon. 2. The use of skeletal traction following failure of primary emergency CRPF results in local improvement in the fracture region and allows for scheduling an elective repeat delayed closed reduction and percutaneous K wire fixation procedure. 3. The algorithm used in clinical practice, based on literature reports and the author’s experience, helps achieve good treatment outcomes.

scholarly journals Open reduction and pinning for the treatment of Gartland extension type III supracondylar humeral fractures in children

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Aslan ◽  
Mehmet Nuri Konya ◽  
Aykut Özdemir ◽  
Hüseyin Yorgancigil ◽  
Gökhan Maralcan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Reduction ◽  
Humeral Fractures ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Fractures In Children ◽  
Supracondylar Humeral Fractures

scholarly journals Displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children: Comparison of three treatment approaches

2016 ◽  
Vol 144 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 46-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinisa Ducic ◽  
Marko Bumbasirevic ◽  
Vladimir Radlovic ◽  
Petar Nikic ◽  
Zoran Bukumiric ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Percutaneous Pinning ◽  
Cast Immobilisation ◽  
Fractures In Children ◽  
Supracondylar Humerus Fractures ◽  
Wire Fixation ◽  
Supracondylar Humeral Fractures ◽  
Humerus Fractures

Introduction. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning are the most widely used treatment options for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children, but there is still no consensus concerning the most preferred technique in injuries of the extension type. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare three common orthopaedic procedures in the treatment of displaced extension type supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Methods. Total of 93 consecutive patients (66 boys and 27 girls) referred to our hospital with Gartland type II or III extension supracondylar humeral fractures were prospectively included in the study over a six-year period. At initial presentation 48 patients were classified as Gartland type II and 45 as Gartland type III fractures. The patients were subdivided into three groups based on the following treatment modality: closed reduction with percutaneous pinning, open reduction with Kirschner wires (K-wires) fixation, and closed reduction with cast immobilisation. The treatment outcome and clinical characteristics were compared among groups, as well as evaluated using Flynn?s criteria. Results. Excellent clinical outcome was reported in 70.3% of patients treated with closed reduction with percutaneous pinning and in 64.7% of patients treated with open reduction with K-wire fixation. The outcome was significantly worse in children treated with closed reduction and cast immobilisation alone, as excellent outcome is achieved in just 36.4% of cases (p=0.011). Conclusion. Closed reduction with percutaneous pinning is the method of choice in the treatment of displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture, while open reduction with K-wire fixation is as a good alternative in cases with clear indications.

scholarly journals Tips and pitfalls of reduction and fixation in displaced supracondylar fractures in children

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Joon-Woo Kim ◽  
Kyeong-Hyeon Park ◽  
Chang-Wug Oh
Keyword(s):  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Humeral Fractures ◽  
Cubitus Varus ◽  
Supracondylar Fractures ◽  
Fixation Technique ◽  
Lateral Entry ◽  
Reduction Techniques ◽  
Fractures In Children ◽  
Loss Of Reduction ◽  
Supracondylar Humeral Fractures

Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common injury of the elbow in children. Compared to flexion type fractures, extension type fractures are more common, up to 98%. Gartland classification has been used to guide the management of this injury, which is based on the extent of the displacement. If not adequately managed, completely displaced (type III) fractures may have a higher incidence of concomitant injury or complications, including neurovascular injury, compartment syndrome, or cubitus varus. Closed reduction followed by percutaneous pinning has been suggested as the standard operative method for the displaced supracondylar humeral fractures. However, these fractures can be challenging to reduce, with the traditional technique of closed reduction. Lateral-entry pinning is known as a sufficient method of fixation for this injury. However, the lateral pin only fixation technique may also result in loss of reduction in some particular patterns of fractures, such as fractures with medial column comminution. We discuss and describe the reduction techniques of completely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures, including technical tips and pitfalls for closed reduction and open reduction. We also discuss indications of medial pinning, and its safe method, when the lateral-entry pins may not achieve adequate stability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document