scholarly journals High risk of hip dislocation following polyethylene liner exchange in total hip arthroplasty—is cup revision necessary?

2020 ◽  
Vol 140 (11) ◽  
pp. 1837-1845
Author(s):  
D. Dammerer ◽  
F. Schneider ◽  
T. Renkawitz ◽  
D. Putzer ◽  
M. Bogensperger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Hip Dislocation ◽  
Polyethylene Liner ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Risk Increase ◽  
Cup Revision

Abstract Purpose Polyethylene (PE) wear remains a common reason for revision surgery following total hip arthroplasty (THA). An established treatment method is isolated liner exchange in a well-fixed acetabular cup and entails a known high risk of hip dislocation after revision surgery. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the rate of hip dislocation after liner exchange. Methods Patients were included if (1) the PE liner was removable, (2) the acetabular shell was stable with acceptable orientation, (3) no osteolysis around the acetabular cup was found and (4) no dislocation of the THA occurred before revision surgery. We reviewed medical histories and performed radiological measurements using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse (EBRA) software. EBRA measurements and statistical investigations were performed by two independent investigators. Results A total of 82 patients were included in our study. Mean follow-up was six (range: 3.6–9.9) years. In 13 (15.8%) patients THA dislocations occurred at a mean postoperative period of 20.2 (range: 1–44) weeks after revising the PE liner. This is equivalent to an absolute risk increase of 16% after revision surgery, which results in a number needed to harm of 6. This means that every sixth patient with isolated liner exchange can expect to experience dislocation due to wear. Conclusion In conclusion, isolated exchange of the polyethylene liner because of wear showed a high risk of dislocation and further cup revision. Our results suggest that the threshold for revising well-fixed components in the case of liner wear should be lowered. Trial Registration number and date of registration Number: 20140710-1012 and Date: 2016-03-09.

Do Cemented Dual-Mobility Cups Confer Stability for Patients at High Risk of Dislocation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?

2018 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 088-091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perry Evangelista ◽  
Kamil Okroj ◽  
Darren Plummer ◽  
Craig Della Valle ◽  
Ran Schwarzkopf
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Metal Shell ◽  
Dual Mobility ◽  
Total Hip

AbstractDislocation is among the most commonly reported complications following revision total hip arthroplasty. Dual-mobility bearings may lower the risk of dislocation. The authors report the results of a multicenter study evaluating the use of a dual-mobility acetabular cup design that was cemented into a metal shell as part of complex acetabular reconstructions or in cases where the risk of dislocation was felt to be high, such as isolated bearing exchanges. Eighteen patients were identified for being at high risk of dislocation who underwent cementation of a dual-mobility shell that is specifically made for cementation, into a fully porous metal revision acetabular cup (10 patients) or into a well-fixed cup at the time of revision without removal of the existing acetabular component (eight patients). Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically at a minimum of 2 years for the evidence of dislocation, revision surgery, and implant loosening. At a mean of 36 months (range, 25–56 months), one patient died and one was lost to follow-up. There were no known cases of hip dislocation. There was one repeat revision, for a deep infection treated with irrigation and debridement. The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score of 46 (range, 40–79) improved to a mean of 65 points (range, 41–97) at the most recent evaluation. Acetabular components were retained in 8 out of 18 cases and the dual-mobility shell was cemented into it. Cementation of a dual-mobility cup into a shell at the time of a revision surgery is a safe and reliable construct at minimum of 2 years for patients at high risk of dislocation. There were no complications related to the cementation of the cup into the metal shell. Longer follow-up is required to further assess the durability of this construct.

Failure Mode of Polyethylene Liner in Total Hip Arthroplasty with Harris-Galante II Acetabular Cup

2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 766
Author(s):  
Byung Woo Min ◽  
Ki Cheol Bae ◽  
Kyung Jae Lee ◽  
Sung Won Sohn ◽  
Chul Hyung Kang
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Polyethylene Liner ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Total Hip

Acetabular Cup Revision Combined With Tensor Facia Lata Reconstruction for Management of Massive Abductor Avulsion After Failed Total Hip Arthroplasty

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1052-1057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Drexler ◽  
Tim Dwyer ◽  
Yona Kosashvili ◽  
Rajesh Chakravertty ◽  
Mansuor Abolghasemian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Cup Revision

scholarly journals Outcome of dual mobility total hip arthroplasty in patients who are at high risk for dislocation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basavaraj S. Kyavater ◽  
Rafeeq M. D. ◽  
Sathish Kumar ◽  
Hemanth P. Hallinalli
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Dislocation ◽  
Dual Mobility ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
A Prospective Study

<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a major concern, because it is reported to range from 1% to 5%. The concept of dual mobility articulation was developed in 1970 by Bousquet to decrease dislocation risk. Several studies have looked at the outcome of dual mobility articulation in primary THA and in revision THA.<strong></strong></p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective study of 33 patients undergoing dual mobility THA during 24 months period from October 2017 to September 2019. Patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) to have dual mobility cup (DMC) were those at high risk of dislocation. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 18 months.<strong></strong></p><p><strong>Results: </strong>33 patients (mean age 67 years) underwent DMC THA. 27 patients underwent primary hip replacement. The follow-up of our cases has ranged from 13 months to 3 years with a mean follow-up of 18 months. none of the patients had hip dislocation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong>: The DMC is an effective solution for the management of high-risk cases undergoing total hip replacement to reduce the incidence of postoperative instability.</p>

scholarly journals Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty: should everyone get one?

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 541-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Blakeney ◽  
Jean-Alain Epinette ◽  
Pascal-André Vendittoli
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Polyethylene Liner ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Hip Instability ◽  
Dual Mobility ◽  
Total Hip

Hip instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a major challenge and is one of the main causes of revision surgery. Dual mobility (DM) implants have been introduced to try to overcome this problem. The DM design consists of a small femoral head captive and mobile within a polyethylene liner. Numerous studies have shown that DM implants reduce the rate of dislocation compared to fixed-bearing inserts. Early designs for DM implants had problems with wear and intra-prosthetic dislocations, so their use was restricted to limited indications. The results of the latest generation of DM prostheses demonstrate that these problems have been overcome. Given the results of these studies presented in this review, surgeons may now consider DM THA for a wider patient selection. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:541-547. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180045

scholarly journals Staged reconstruction of unilateral neglected hip dislocation through total hip arthroplasty and subsequent intramedullary femoral lengthening

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjoern Vogt ◽  
Christoph Theil ◽  
Georg Gosheger ◽  
Adrien Frommer ◽  
Burkhard Moellenbeck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Hip Dislocation ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Femoral Lengthening ◽  
Shortening Osteotomy ◽  
Successful Approach ◽  
Staged Reconstruction

Abstract Background and purpose Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful approach to treat unilateral symptomatic neglected hip dislocation (NHD). However, the extensive leg length discrepancy (LLD) can hereby only be partially corrected. In case of residual LLD of more than 2 cm, subsequent femoral lengthening can be considered. Patients/material/methods Retrospective analysis of clinical data and radiographs of five patients (age 38.1 (28–51) years) with unilateral NHD who underwent THA with (n  = 3) or without (n = 2) subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy (SSO) and secondary intramedullary femoral lengthening through a retrograde magnetically-driven lengthening nail (follow-up 18.4 (15–27) months). Results LLD was 51.0 (45–60) mm before and 37.0 (30–45) mm after THA. Delayed bone union at one SSO site healed after revision with autologous bone grafting and plate fixation. Subsequent lengthening led to leg length equalisation in all patients. Complete consolidation was documented in all lengthened segments. Conclusion Staged reconstruction via THA and secondary femoral lengthening can successfully be used to reconstruct the hip joint and equalise LLD. The specific anatomical conditions have to be taken into consideration when planning treatment, and patients ought to be closely monitored.

Efficacy of NSAIDs versus radiotherapy for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002199111
Author(s):  
Jacob Shapira ◽  
Mitchell J Yelton ◽  
Jeffery W Chen ◽  
Philip J Rosinsky ◽  
David R Maldonado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Randomised Control Trials ◽  
Risk Patients

Background: The aims of this systematic review were: (1) to investigate the prophylactic effect of radiotherapy (RT) and NSAIDs in high-risk patients following total hip arthroplasty (THA); and (2) to compare the efficacy of non-selective and COX-II selective NSAIDs in preventing post-THA HO, utilising a meta-analysis of randomised control studies. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for articles regarding HO following THA in March 2019. Studies were included if they contained data regarding HO incidence after THA or contained data regarding HO prophylaxis comparison of NSAIDs and/or RT in terms of dosage or duration. Results: 24 studies reported on populations that were not at high-risk for HO. These studies reported between 47.3% and 90.4% of their patient populations had no HO formation; between 2.8% and 52.7% had mild formation; and between 0.0% and 10.4% had severe formation. A total of 13 studies reported on populations at high-risk for HO. Studies analysing RT in high-risk patients reported between 28.6% and 97.4% of patients developed no HO formation; between 1.9% and 66.7% developed mild HO formation; and between 0.0% and 11.9% developed severe HO formation. Studies analysing NSAID treatment among high-risk populations reported between 76.6% and 88.9% had no HO formation; between 11.1% and 23.4% had mild HO formation, and between 0.0% and 1.8% had severe HO formation. 9 studies were identified as randomised control trials and subsequently used for meta-analysis. The relative risk for COX-II in developing any HO after THA was not significantly different compared to non-selective NSAIDs (RR 1.00; CI, 0.801–1.256; p = 0.489). Conclusions: NSAIDs prophylaxis for HO may have better efficacy than RT in high-risk patients following THA. Non-selective and COX-II selective NSAIDs have comparable efficacy in preventing HO. Factors such as medical comorbidities and side-effect profile should dictate the prophylaxis recommendation.

CT-based automated planning of acetabular cup for total hip arthroplasty (THA) based on hybrid use of two statistical atlases

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2253-2271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Kagiyama ◽  
Itaru Otomaru ◽  
Masaki Takao ◽  
Nobuhiko Sugano ◽  
Masahiko Nakamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Automated Planning ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Total Hip
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document