Functional outcome in patients with advanced head and neck cancer: surgery and reconstruction with free flaps versus primary radiochemotherapy

2011 ◽  
Vol 269 (2) ◽  
pp. 629-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uta Tschiesner ◽  
Lena Schuster ◽  
Sebastian Strieth ◽  
Ulrich Harréus
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (03) ◽  
pp. 283-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajan Arora ◽  
Vinay Kumar Verma ◽  
Kripa Shanker Mishra ◽  
Hemant Bhoye ◽  
Rahul Kapoor

ABSTRACT Aims and Objective: The aim of the present article is to highlight how reconstruction with free flaps is different and difficult in cases with robotic head-and-neck cancer surgery. It also highlights the technical guidelines on how to manage the difficulties. Materials and Methods: Eleven patients with oropharyngeal cancer having undergone tumour excision followed by free-flap reconstruction been reviewed here. Nine patients had tumour excision done robotically through intraoral route while neck dissection done with transverse neck crease incision. There is a problem of difficult flap inset in this group of patient. Two patients had intraoral excision of tumour followed by robotic neck dissection via retroauricular incision. With no incision directly on the neck, microvascular anastomosis is challenging in this set of patients. Free flap was used in all the cases to reconstruct the defect. Results: Successful reconstruction with free flap was done in all the cases with good outcome both functionally and aesthetically. Conclusion: Free-flap reconstruction is possible in robotic head-and-neck cancer surgery despite small and difficult access, but it does need practice and some technical modifications for good outcome.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (01) ◽  
pp. 066-073 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Brinkman ◽  
Shoista Kambiz ◽  
Tim de Jong ◽  
Marc Mureau

Background The use of simultaneous, multiple free flaps has become a reliable reconstructive option in patients with extensive composite defects after resection of locally advanced head and neck cancer. However, some reluctance remains among reconstructive surgeons with concerns regarding flap outcomes and limited patient survival. Therefore, we evaluated complications, long-term patient survival, and patient-reported outcomes following these extensive head and neck reconstructions. Methods All consecutive patients treated with multiple free flaps for reconstruction of extensive composite defects after resection of locally advanced head and neck cancer between 1999 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient charts were evaluated for demographics, treatment details, complications, and patient survival. In addition, all patients alive at the start of the study were asked to complete the 10-item Eat Assessment Tool (EAT-10) and the Intelligibility Rating Scale (IRS). Results Eighty-four simultaneous, multiple free flaps were performed in 42 patients. The predominant free flap combination consisted of a fibula with either an anterolateral thigh (n = 22) or a radial forearm flap (n = 14). Complete flap survival was 95%. Nineteen patients were still alive with a mean follow-up of 55 months. Five-year patient survival was 46.3%. Mean EAT-10 score was 8.4 (range: 0–29), with only one patient reporting problematic swallowing. Ninety percent of the patients had moderate to good speech intelligibility with the IRS. Conclusion Multiple, simultaneous free flaps can be performed safely, leading to acceptable long-term patient survival and patient-reported functional outcomes. Our study demonstrates that it is worthwhile to perform these challenging microvascular reconstructions in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.


1997 ◽  
Vol 117 (sup529) ◽  
pp. 245-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mäkitie ◽  
K. Aitasalo ◽  
J. Pukander ◽  
J. Virtaniemi ◽  
K. Hyrynkangas ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-376
Author(s):  
Quak ◽  
Van Bokhorst ◽  
Klop ◽  
Van Leeuwen ◽  
Snow

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mallory J. Raymond ◽  
Roberto M. Soriano ◽  
Ryan Belcher ◽  
C. Arturo Solares

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document