Utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

Purpose: There are many studies on sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in thyroid carcinoma but SLN biopsy (SLNB) in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remains open to debate. Therefore in this retrospective study, the usefulness of SLNB in thyroid carcinoma patients who had micro-PTC without cervical lymphadenopathy was assessed.Methods: SLNB was performed in 114 patients who were diagnosed with micro-PTC in a single lobe without palpable or ultrasound-detected lymph node at the tertiary center between January 2012 and December 2013. After SLNB, all patients underwent total thyroidectomy and central neck dissection or thyroid lobectomy and central neck dissection of the single side.Results: SLNs were identified in 112 of 114 patients with 41 positive SLNs and 71 negative SLNs on intraoperative frozen sections. However, eight negative patients were found to be positive in the final pathology. Sentinel node identification rate and false negative value of SLNB were 98.2% and 11.3%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, higher lymph node metastasis was detected in men than in women. Higher detection number of SLN showed higher probability of lymph node metastasis.Conclusion: SLNB may be helpful in papillary thyroid cancer, especially in male patients. Also, it is useful for the staging of nodal status and clearance of persistent disease.

Complications of Modified Radical Neck Dissection in Patients at Tertiary Care Hospital

Objective: To determine frequency of complication of modified radical neck dissection in patients at a tertiary care hospital Karachi, Pakistan Material and Methods: Study design: This is a cross sectional section study, conducted at Department of ENT, for Six months from January 1, 2019 to July 1, 2019. All the patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and visited to department of ENT, were included in the study after taking informed consent. Patients were discharged by 48-72 hours postoperatively. Patients were assessed daily till the time of discharge for occurrence of nerve complication, wound complications and vascular complications. Data was entered and analyzed by SPSS 21 software. Mean, Frequency and percentage were given for continuous and discreet data respectively. Chi squire test was applied to detect significance. P value of < o.o5 was taken as significant. Results: Mean ± SD of age was 40.31±9.54 with C.I (38.62.......41.99) years. Out of 126 patients 84 (67%) were male and 42 (33%) were female. Out of 126 cases complication 46(37%) developed nerve complication, 47 (37%) had wound complication and vascular complication was documented in 27(21%) cases. Conclusion: surgical complications after modified radical neck surgery are not uncommon. Wound complication was found to be most common followed by nerve and vascular complication. Therefore proper antiseptic measures before, during and after surgery, patient care and careful surgical steps have a role in preventing these dreadful complications. Keywords: Modified Radical Neck Dissection, Complications, Nerve Complication, Wound Complication, Vascular Complication

Long-Term Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients Who Underwent Selective Neck Dissection for Metachronous Isolated Supraclavicular Nodal Metastasis

We retrospectively enrolled 139 patients who developed metachronous isolated supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (miSLNM) from 8129 consecutive patients who underwent primary surgery between 1990 and 2008 at a single medical center. The median age was 47 years. The median follow-up time from date of primary tumor surgery was 73.1 months, and the median time to the date of neck relapse was 43.9 months in this study. Sixty-one (43.9%) patients underwent selective neck dissection (SND). The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), post-recurrence survival, and overall survival (OS) rates in the SND group were 31.1%, 40.3%, and 68.9%, respectively, whereas those of the no-SND group were 9.7%, 32.9%, and 57.7%, respectively (p = 0.001). No SND and time interval from primary tumor surgery to neck relapse ≤24 months were the only significant risk factors in the multivariate analysis of DMFS (hazard ratio (HR), 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23–2.56; p = 0.002 and HR, 1.76, 95% CI, 1.23–2.52; p = 0.002, respectively) and OS (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22–2.55; p = 0.003 and HR, 3.54, 95% CI, 2.44–5.16; p < 0.0001, respectively). Multimodal therapy, including neck dissection, significantly improved the DMFS and OS of miSLNM. Survival improvement after miSLNM control by intensive surgical treatment suggests that miSLNM is not distant metastasis.

Endoscopic Lateral Neck Dissection: A New Frontier in Endoscopic Thyroid Surgery

BackgroundEndoscopic thyroidectomy and robotic thyroidectomy are effective and safe surgical options for thyroid surgery, with excellent cosmetic outcomes. However, in regard to lateral neck dissection (LND), much effort is required to alleviate cervical disfigurement derived from a long incision. Technologic innovations have allowed for endoscopic LND, without the need for extended cervical incisions and providing access to remote sites, including axillary, chest–breast, face-lift, transoral, and hybrid approaches.MethodsA comprehensive review of published literature was performed using the search terms “lateral neck dissection”, “thyroid”, and “endoscopy OR endoscopic OR endoscope OR robotic” in PubMed.ResultsThis review provides an overview of the current knowledge regarding endoscopic LND, and it specifically addresses the following points: 1) the surgical procedure, 2) the indications and contraindications, 3) the complications and surgical outcomes, and 4) the technical advantages and limitations. Robotic LND, totally endoscopic LND, and endoscope-assisted LND are separately discussed.ConclusionsEndoscopic LND is a feasible and safe technique in terms of complete resection of the selected neck levels, complications, and cosmetic outcomes. However, it is recommended to strictly select criteria when expanding the population of eligible patients. A formal indication for endoscopic LND has not yet been established. Thus, a well-designed, multicenter study with a large cohort is necessary to confirm the feasibility, long-term outcomes, oncological safety, and influence of endoscopic LND on patient quality of life (QoL).