Recurrent adamantinoma in the thoracolumbar spine successfully treated by three-level total en bloc spondylectomy by a single posterior approach

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (S4) ◽  
pp. 514-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping-Guo Duan ◽  
Ruo-Yu Li ◽  
Yun-Qi Jiang ◽  
Hui-ren Wang ◽  
Xiao-Gang Zhou ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 556-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Huang ◽  
Keng Chen ◽  
Ji-chao Ye ◽  
Yong Tang ◽  
Rui Yang ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironobu Sakaura ◽  
Noboru Hosono ◽  
Yoshihiro Mukai ◽  
Takahiro Ishii ◽  
Kazuo Yonenobu ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morio Matsumoto ◽  
Kota Watanabe ◽  
Takashi Tsuji ◽  
Ken Ishii ◽  
Masaya Nakamura ◽  
...  

Object The object of this study was to investigate failures after spinal reconstruction following total en bloc spondylectomy (TES), related factors, and sequelae arising from such failures in patients with malignant spinal tumors. Methods Fifteen patients (12 males and 3 females, with a mean age of 46.5 years) with malignant spinal tumors who underwent TES and survived for more than 1 year were included in this analysis (mean follow-up 41.5 months). Seven patients had primary tumors, including giant cell tumors in 4 patients, chordoma in 2, and Ewing sarcoma in 1. Eight patients had metastatic tumors, including thyroid cancer in 6 and renal cell cancer and malignant fibrous histiocytoma in 1 patient each. Seven patients without prominent paravertebral extension of the tumor were treated using a posterior approach alone, and 8 patients who exhibited prominent anterior or anterolateral extension of the tumors into the thoracic or abdominal cavity were treated using a combined anterior and posterior approach. Spinal reconstruction after tumor resection was performed using a combination of anterior structural support and posterior instrumentation. The relationship between instrumentation failure and clinical and radiographic factors, including age, sex, history of previous surgery, preoperative radiotherapy, tumor histology, tumor level, surgical approach, number of resected vertebrae, rod diameter, number of instrumented vertebrae, and cage subsidence, was investigated. Results Six patients (40%) with spinal instrumentation failure were identified: rod breakage occurred in 3 patients, and breakage of both the rod and the cage, combined cage breakage and screw back-out, and endplate fracture arising from cage subsidence occurred in 1 patient each. All of these patients experienced acute or chronic back pain, but only 1 patient with a tumor recurrence experienced neurological deterioration upon instrumentation failure. Cage subsidence (≥ 5 mm), preoperative irradiation, and the number of instrumented vertebrae (≤ 4 vertebrae) were significantly related to late instrumentation failure. Conclusions Late instrumentation failure was a frequent complication after TES. Although patients with instrumentation failure experienced back pain, the neurological sequelae were not catastrophic. For prevention, meticulous preparation of the graft site and a longer posterior fixation should be considered.


2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 1193-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Melcher ◽  
Alexander C. Disch ◽  
Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann ◽  
Stefan Tohtz ◽  
Mirko Smolny ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taolin Fang ◽  
Jian Dong ◽  
Xiaogang Zhou ◽  
Robert A. McGuire ◽  
Xilei Li

Object The object of this study was to compare the mini-open anterior corpectomy procedure with posterior total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) in treating patients with solitary metastases of the thoracolumbar spine. Methods From 2004 to 2010, 41 patients with solitary metastases of the thoracolumbar spine were treated in our hospital using either a mini-open anterior corpectomy or posterior TES. Intraoperative and diagnostic data, including perioperative complications, were collected using retrospective chart review. The surgical outcomes were assessed according to survival status, neurological function, local recurrence, and pain before and after surgery. Results Seventeen patients underwent posterior TES and 24 underwent mini-open anterior corpectomy. Mean blood loss (TES, 1721 ± 293 ml; mini-open corpectomy, 1058 ± 263 ml; p < 0.05), and mean operative time (TES, 403 ± 55 minutes; mini-open corpectomy, 175 ± 38 minutes; p < 0.05) were recorded and calculated. Neurological improvement by at least 1 American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade was noted in 35 (97.2%) of the 36 cases with preoperative deficits. After the operation, 68.4% of nonambulatory patients became ambulatory again, including 84.6% after mini-open corpectomy and 33.3% after posterior TES (p > 0.05). The visual analog scale scores of the patients were significantly reduced after both procedures, with no difference between the procedures (p > 0.05). The local tumor recurrence rate of the TES group was significantly lower than that of the mini-open corpectomy group (p < 0.05), while the postoperative survival rates within 2 years after surgery were similar. The complication rate in the mini-open corpectomy group (29.2%) was higher than that in the TES group (11.8%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.185). There was no hardware failure and no loss of the sagittal Cobb angle in either group. Slight subsidence (< 3 mm) of the mesh cage was observed with a successful fusion in 3 (17.6%) of 17 patients in the TES group. No subsidence of polymethylmethacrylate block/autograft was recorded in the mini-open group. Conclusions Mini-open anterior corpectomy can be accomplished with less blood loss, fewer fixation instrumentations, and shorter surgical time than that required for TES, but patients who undergo a mini-open corpectomy might have a greater tendency to experience local recurrence. A mini-open anterior corpectomy has a relatively mild learning curve and involves fewer technical difficulties. With smaller incisions, mini-open anterior corpectomy is an option in treating solitary metastases of the thoracolumbar spine.


2003 ◽  
Vol 69 (677) ◽  
pp. 128-134
Author(s):  
Jiro SAKAMOTO ◽  
Juhachi ODA ◽  
Atsushi KAKUUCHI ◽  
Tomoyuki AKAMARU ◽  
Norio KAWAHARA ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 1567-1571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Murakami ◽  
Satoru Demura ◽  
Satoshi Kato ◽  
Katsuhito Yoshioka ◽  
Hiroyuki Hayashi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document