Elective plug repair of an incarcerated obturator hernia by the thigh approach after noninvasive manual reduction: Report of two cases

Surgery Today ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Tanaka ◽  
Jun Kikuchi ◽  
Toshinori Ando
2018 ◽  
Vol 226 (5) ◽  
pp. 891-901
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Kawanaka ◽  
Shoji Hiroshige ◽  
Nobuhide Kubo ◽  
Teijiro Hirashita ◽  
Takeshi Masuda ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1572-1576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki TANAKA ◽  
Jun KIKUCHI ◽  
Toru YUSA ◽  
Toshinori ANDO ◽  
Yuko SAITO

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Togawa ◽  
Kyohei Kamihata ◽  
Yoshio Nagahisa ◽  
Kazuyuki Kawamoto

Abstract Background Obturator hernias are uncommon but are important causes of intestinal obstruction. Delayed treatment can be fatal. Emergency surgery is considered the most effective treatment; however, patients with obturator hernia usually have comorbidities, and this precludes them from emergency surgery. Previously, a few case studies reported successful manual reductions for an incarcerated obturator hernia. However, their efficacy was not statistically confirmed. We have devised a new manual reduction method for an incarcerated obturator hernia based on previous studies. We have named this method “Four-hand Reduction for Obturator hernia with the Guidance of Sonography” (FROGS). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of FROGS as a new treatment strategy for obturator hernia. Methods Since November 2019, we have tried FROGS in all patients with obturator hernia at the emergency room. We retrospectively compared the clinical data of 14 patients who underwent FROGS (after-FROGS group) with those of 23 patients who did not (before-FROGS group). Results All patients were females. There were no significant differences in age, lesion side, duration of symptoms, the diameter of the prolapsed bowel, and predisposing factors. The body mass index was significantly lower in the after-FROGS group than in the before-FROGS group. Manual reduction was successfully performed in all 14 patients in the FROGS group, whereas in the before-FROGS group, 14 patients underwent manual reduction, of whom only one was successfully treated using the non-FROGS method. Bowel resection was avoided in all 14 patients in the after-FROGS group, whereas 8 patients underwent bowel resection in the before-FROGS group. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications and mortality within 30 days after hernia presentation between the two groups. Conclusion Manual reduction using the FROGS technique was found to be safe and reproducible and can be the first treatment choice for patients with obturator hernia.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (8) ◽  
pp. rju081-rju081 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ramser ◽  
A. S. Messmer ◽  
I. Zbinden ◽  
U. Von Holzen ◽  
C. A. Nebiker

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Togawa ◽  
Kyohei Kamihata ◽  
Yoshio Nagahisa ◽  
Kazuyuki Kawamoto

Abstract Purpose: Obturator hernias are uncommon but are important causes of intestinal obstruction. Delayed treatment can be fatal. Emergency surgery is considered the most effective treatment; however, patients with obturator hernia usually have comorbidities, and this precludes them from emergency surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Four-hand Reduction for Obturator hernia with the Guidance of Sonography (FROGS) as a new treatment strategy for obturator hernia.Methods: Since November 2019, we have tried FROGS in all patients with obturator hernia at the emergency room. We retrospectively compared the clinical data of 14 patients who underwent FROGS (after-FROGS group) with those of 23 patients who did not (before-FROGS group).Results: All patients were females. There were no significant differences in age, lesion side, duration of symptoms, the diameter of the prolapsed bowel, and predisposing factors. The body mass index was significantly lower in the after-FROGS group than in the before-FROGS group. Manual reduction was successfully performed in all 14 patients in the FROGS group, whereas in the before-FROGS group, 14 patients underwent manual reduction, of whom only one was successfully treated using the non-FROGS method. Bowel resection was avoided in all 14 patients in the after-FROGS group, whereas 8 patients underwent bowel resection in the before-FROGS group. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications and mortality within 30 days after hernia presentation between the two groups.Conclusion: Manual reduction using the FROGS technique was found to be safe and reproducible and can be the first treatment choice for patients with obturator hernia.


1985 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2515-2517
Author(s):  
Tokiharu MIYAHARA ◽  
Minoru NAKATAKE ◽  
Takeshi ISHIKAWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Yamazaki ◽  
Yasunori Otowa ◽  
Shunsuke Kusano ◽  
Koichi Nakajima ◽  
Shinsuke Satake ◽  
...  

Hernia ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Togawa ◽  
T. Muronoi ◽  
H. Kawaguchi ◽  
T. Chiku ◽  
W. Sano ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document