scholarly journals Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirley Raiane Mamede Veloso ◽  
Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo Lemos ◽  
Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes ◽  
Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos ◽  
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Composite Restorations

Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Maria Antonelli da Veiga ◽  
Amanda Carneiro Cunha ◽  
Daniele Masterson Tavares Pereira Ferreira ◽  
Tatiana Kelly da Silva Fidalgo ◽  
Thomaz Kauark Chianca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Composite Restorations

Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. A systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 12-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flora Angeletaki ◽  
Andreas Gkogkos ◽  
Efstratios Papazoglou ◽  
Dimitrios Kloukos
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Composite Restorations

scholarly journals Clinical performance of laminate and non-laminate resin composite restorations: a systematic review

2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 520-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
KV Nguyen ◽  
C Sathorn ◽  
RH Wong ◽  
MF Burrow
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Composite Restorations

scholarly journals Clinical Effectiveness of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Resin Composite Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Polymers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heber Isac Arbildo-Vega ◽  
Barbara Lapinska ◽  
Saurav Panda ◽  
César Lamas-Lara ◽  
Abdul Samad Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Color Stability ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Restoration Technique ◽  
Bibliographic Search

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the clinical effectiveness of bulk-fill and conventional resin in composite restorations. A bibliographic search was carried out until May 2020, in the biomedical databases Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CENTRAL and Web of Science. The study selection criteria were: randomized clinical trials, in English, with no time limit, with a follow-up greater than or equal to 6 months and that reported the clinical effects (absence of fractures, absence of discoloration or marginal staining, adequate adaptation marginal, absence of post-operative sensitivity, absence of secondary caries, adequate color stability and translucency, proper surface texture, proper anatomical form, adequate tooth integrity without wear, adequate restoration integrity, proper occlusion, absence of inflammation and adequate point of contact) of restorations made with conventional and bulk resins. The risk of bias of the study was analyzed using the Cochrane Manual of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Sixteen articles were eligible and included in the study. The results indicated that there is no difference between restorations with conventional and bulk resins for the type of restoration, type of tooth restored and restoration technique used. However, further properly designed clinical studies are required in order to reach a better conclusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document