Ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage in patients on antiplatelet therapy for endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms. A meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Cagnazzo ◽  
Davide Tiziano Di Carlo ◽  
Giandomenico Petrella ◽  
Paolo Perrini
2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1148-1153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-dong Liang ◽  
Zi-liang Wang ◽  
Tian-xiao Li ◽  
Ying-kun He ◽  
Wei-xing Bai ◽  
...  

BackgroundCoil embolization of intracranial aneurysms is being increasingly used; however, thromboembolic events have become a major periprocedural complication.ObjectiveTo determine the safety and efficacy of prophylactic tirofiban in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms.MethodsTirofiban was administered as an intravenous bolus (8.0 μg/kg over 3 min) followed by a maintenance infusion (0.10 μg/kg/min) before stent deployment or after completion of single coiling. Dual oral antiplatelet therapy (loading doses) was overlapped with half the tirofiban dose 2 h before cessation of the tirofiban infusion. Cases of intracranial hemorrhage or thromboembolism were recorded.ResultsTirofiban was prophylactically used in 221 patients, including 175 (79.19%) who underwent stent-assisted coiling and 46 (20.81%) who underwent single coiling, all in the setting of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Six (2.71%) cases of intracranial hemorrhage occurred, including four (1.81%) tirofiban-related cases and two (0.90%) antiplatelet therapy-related cases. There were two (0.90%) cases of fatal hemorrhage, one related to tirofiban and the other related to dual antiplatelet therapy. Thromboembolic events occurred in seven (3.17%) patients (6 stent-assisted embolization, 1 single coiling), of which one (0.45%) event occurred during stenting and six (2.72%) occurred during intravenous tirofiban maintenance. No thromboembolic events related to dual antiplatelet therapy were found.ConclusionsTirofiban bolus over 3 min followed by maintenance infusion appears to be a safe and efficient prophylactic protocol for the endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms and may be an alternative to intraoperative oral antiplatelet therapy, especially in the case of stent-assisted embolization.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 924-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean G. de Oliveira ◽  
Jürgen Beck ◽  
Matthias Setzer ◽  
Rüdiger Gerlach ◽  
Hartmut Vatter ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVE To compare the risk of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms by clipping versus coiling. METHODS We analyzed 596 patients prospectively added to our database from July of 1999 to November of 2005 concerning the risk of shunt dependency after clipping versus coiling. Factors analyzed included age; sex; Hunt and Hess grade; Fisher grade; acute hydrocephalus; intraventricular hemorrhage; angiographic vasospasm; and number, size, and location of aneurysms. In addition, a meta-analysis of available data from the literature was performed identifying four studies with quantitative data on the frequency of clip, coil, and shunt dependency. RESULTS The institutional series revealed Hunt and Hess grade, Fisher grade, acute hydrocephalus, intraventricular hemorrhage, and angiographic vasospasm as significant (P < 0.05) risk factors for shunt dependency after a univariate analysis. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, we isolated intraventricular hemorrhage, acute hydrocephalus, and angiographic vasospasm as independent, significant risk factors for shunt dependency. The meta-analysis, including the current data, revealed a significantly higher risk for shunt dependency after coiling than after clipping (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION Clipping of a ruptured aneurysm may be associated with a lower risk for developing shunt dependency, possibly by clot removal. This might influence long-term outcome and surgical decision making.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 228-228
Author(s):  
Erick Michael Westbroek ◽  
Matthew Bender ◽  
Narlin B Beaty ◽  
Bowen Jiang ◽  
Risheng Xu AB ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION ISAT demonstrated that coiling is effective for aneurysm treatment in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH); however, complete occlusion of wide-necked aneurysms frequently requires adjuvants relatively contraindicated in SAH. As such, a limited “dome occlusive” strategy is often pursued in the setting of SAH. We report a single institution series of coiling of acutely ruptured aneurysms followed by delayed flow diversion for definitive, curative occlusion. METHODS A prospectively collected IRB-approved database was screened for patients with aneurysmal SAH who were initially treated by coil embolization followed by planned flow diversion at a single academic medical institution. Peri-procedural outcomes, complications, and angiographic follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS >50 patients underwent both acute coiling followed by delayed, planned flow diversion. Average aneurysm size on initial presentation was 9.5 mm. Common aneurysm locations included Pcomm (36%), Acomm (30%), MCA (10%), ACA (10%), and vertebral (5%). Dome occlusion was achieved in all cases following initial coiling. Second-stage implantation of a flow diverting stent was achieved in 49/50 cases (98%). Follow-up angiography was available for 33/50 patients (66%), with mean follow-up of 11 months. 27 patients (82%) had complete angiographic occlusion at last follow up. All patients with residual filling at follow-up still had dome occlusion. There were no mortalities (0%). Major complication rate for stage I coiling was 2% (1 patient with intra-procedural aneurysm re-rupture causing increase in a previous ICH). Major complication rate for stage 2 flow diversion was 2% (1 patient with ischemic stroke following noncompliance with dual antiplatelet regimen). Minor complications occurred in 2 additional patients (4%) with transient neurological deficits. CONCLUSION Staged endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with acute dome-occlusive coil embolization followed by delayed flow diversion is a safe and effective treatment strategy.


Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M Starke ◽  
Nohra Chalouhi ◽  
Muhammad S Ali ◽  
David L Penn ◽  
Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris ◽  
...  

Purpose: In this study we assess predictors of outcome following endovascular treatment of small ruptured intracranial aneurysms (SRA). Methods: Between 2004 and 2011, 91 patients with SRA (≤ 3 mm) were treated at our institution. Multivariate analysis was carried out to assess predictors of endovascular related complications, aneurysm obliteration (>95%), recanalization, and favorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 3-5). Results: Endovascular treatment was aborted in 9 of 91 patients (9.9%). Procedure-related complications occurred in 8 of 82 patients (9.8%) of which 5 were transient and 3 were permanent. Three patients (3.7%) undergoing endovascular therapy experienced an intra-procedural aneurysm rupture. Three of 9 patients (33.3%) treated with stent or balloon assisted coiling experienced peri-procedural complications compared to 5 of 73 patients (6.8%) receiving only coils or Onyx (p=0.039). There were no procedural deaths or rehemorrhages. Rates of recanalization and retreatment were 18.2% and 12.7%, respectively. No factors predicted initial occlusion or recanalization. In multivariate analysis pre-treatment factors predictive of favorable outcome included younger age (OR=0.94; 95% CI 0.91-0.99, p=0.017), larger aneurysm size (OR=3.4; 95% CI 1.02-11.11, p=0.045), Hunt and Hess grade (OR=0.38; 95% CI 0.19-0.75, p=0.005), and location (OR=5.12; 95% CI 1.29-20.25, p=0.02). When assessing treatment and post-treatment variables, vasospasm was the only additional covariate predictive of poor outcome (OR=5.90; 95% CI 1.34=25.93, p=0.019). Conclusions: The majority of SRA can be treated with endovascular therapy and limited complications. Overall predictors of outcome for patients undergoing endovascular treatment of SRA include age, aneurysm size, Hunt and Hess grade, location, and post-treatment vasospasm.


Neurosurgery ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Gruber ◽  
Karl Ungersböck ◽  
Andrea Reinprecht ◽  
Thomas Czech ◽  
Cordell Gross ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document