Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab combined with macular grid laser photocoagulation for macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 625-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Hayashi ◽  
Tatsuya Yunoki ◽  
Akio Miyakoshi ◽  
Keiichi Mitarai ◽  
Takahiro Fujino ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Wenjuan Luo ◽  
Fengjiao Jia ◽  
Min Liu ◽  
Yunxiao Wang ◽  
Ting Zhang

Purpose. To evaluate the correlative factors of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with intravitreal conbercept injection in macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods. This is a self-controlled retrospective study. 35 eyes of 35 patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO were enrolled. After an initial intravitreal injection of conbercept (0.5 mg/0.05 ml) monthly up to 3 months, a pro re nata (PRN) strategy was adopted based on the increase in central foveal thickness (CFT). Data collected at various time points include BCVA, CFT, photoreceptor layer thickness (PLT), and outer nuclear layer thickness (ONLT) on optical coherence tomography. The correlation between CFT, PLT, ONLT, and BCVA before and after injections was analyzed. Results. Compared with baseline, in months 1, 3, and 6 after injection, the improvement of BCVA was 20.63, 22.94, and 21.06 ETDRS letters, respectively (F=195.843, P<0.01), and the decrease of CFT was 217.37 μm, 224.57 μm, and 224.06 μm, respectively (F=148.522, P<0.01). The PLT in months 1, 3, and 6 after therapy has significant improvement of 11.14 μm, 13.03 μm, and 13.49 μm (F=64.116, P<0.01), while the ONLT has a significant decrease of 225.29 μm, 237.66 μm, and 239.11 μm, respectively (F=145.231, P<0.01). The changes in the treatment group were significant in different periods. The mean number of injections was 3.26 ± 0.50 from baseline to month 6. Conclusions. Intravitreal injection of conbercept provides an effective treatment for macular edema due to BRVO. With six-month treatment, there were a positive correlation between BCVA and PLT (r=0.592, P<0.001), a negative correlation between BCVA and ONLT (r=−0.480, P=0.005), and no correlation between BCVA and CFT (P=0.506).


Folia Medica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-248
Author(s):  
Prashant Kumar ◽  
Yog Raj Sharma ◽  
Parijat Chandra ◽  
Rajvardhan Azad ◽  
Girish Gulab Meshram

Abstract Background: There is an ambiguity regarding the therapy of choice for patients with macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Aim: The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab (3 injections 0.5 mg) versus ranibizumab (1 injection 0.5 mg) with laser photocoagulation (LP) versus dexamethamethasone intravitreal (IVT) implant (0.7 mg) with or without LP in patients with macular edema following BRVO. Materials and methods: 60 eyes of 60 patients were divided into 4 groups. Group 1 received IVT ranibizumab (3 injections 0.5 mg), Group 2 received IVT ranibizumab (1 injection 0.5 mg) + LP, Group 3 received dexamethasone IVT implant (0.7 mg), and Group 4 received dexamethasone IVT implant (0.7 mg) + LP. The endpoints were the difference in mean changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and inter-group differences in contrast sensitivity (CS), retinal sensitivity (RS), and intraocular pressure (IOP). Results: BCVA gains in Group 1 (18.00±8.51) patients were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than patients in Groups 2 (10.00±10.26), 3 (9.50±9.60), and 4 (10.50±10.97), after 6 months of therapy. No significant inter-group variation was found in the CMT, CS, and RS. Conclusions: Ranibizumab (3 injections 0.5 mg) showed significantly higher BCVA gains at 6 months post-therapy. Improvements in the BCVA, CMT, CS, and RS were comparable initially in all the therapies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document