MACULAR SENSITIVITY AND MORPHOLOGY AFTER INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE FOR MACULAR EDEMA WITH BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

Retina ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 1844-1852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidetaka Noma ◽  
Hideharu Funatsu ◽  
Tatsuya Mimura ◽  
Katsunori Shimada
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongxuan Lie ◽  
Meidong Zhu ◽  
Sha Li ◽  
Li Ran ◽  
Xiaohong Meng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To assess the safety and efficacy of post-scleral injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) in macular region to treat macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and compare it with intravitreal injection of TA and Ranibizumab. Methods: This is a prospective, double masked and single-center study. Thirty-six eyes, one from each participant who was diagnosed with macular edema secondary to BRVO between July 2011 and December 2014, were randomised into three groups to receive post-sclera injection of 20mg/0.05ml TA (PS-TA), intravitreal injection of 2mg TA (IV-TA) and intravitreal injection of 0.5mg Ranibuzmab (IV-Ranibizumab), respectively. Changes of retinal thickness in optical coherence tomography (OCT) in foveal (zone 1) and average macular area (1-9 zones) at month 1 and 3 from baseline were the primary outcomes. The secondary study outcomes include changes of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) at month 1 and 3 from baseline and profile of adverse events. Results: The mean thickness changes from the baseline in macular fovea (zone 1) were statistically significant at month 1 in IV-TA and PS-TA groups, respectively (P-value < 0.0005 and P-value = 0.032), but not in Ranibizumab group (P-value = 0.083). At month 3, the mean thickness change from the baseline in macular fovea (zone 1) was statistically significant only in IV-TA group (P-value = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean thickness changes in macular region (zone 1-9) from baseline to month 1 or 3 in any group. No statistically significant differences were detected across the three treatment groups in mean thickness changes in macular fovea (zone 1) nor macular region (zone 1-9), over 1 and 3 months from baseline (P-values > 0.05). No Serious Adverse Event was detected in any treatment group during the study period. Two eyes in the IV-TA group had mild elevated IOP after the injection. Conclusion: PS-TA injection near macular region is safe and effective in treating macular edema secondary to BRVO. PS-TA could reduce the incidence of intraocular hypertension significantly, and thus has the advantages of safety compared to IVTA.


2021 ◽  
pp. 48-49
Author(s):  
Haniyaa Mufti ◽  
Syed Tariq Qureshi ◽  
Birjees Hakak

Purpose: To study the effects of combined intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (IVB) and triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in patients with non-resolving macular edema (ME) secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO). Methods: In a prospective observational study, 50 pseudophakic eyes of BRVO patients with non-resolving central macular edema who had received more than 3 doses of IVB previously were injected with combination therapy of 1.25 mg/0.05 ml IVB and 4 mg of IVTA and followed up for 6 months with best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), intraocular pressure(IOP) and central macular thickness(CMT) Results: The mean BCVA was logMAR 0.75±0.25 at baseline and 0.65±0.15, 0.48±0.20, and 0.22±0.25 at 6weeks, 3 months and 6 months respectively. Mean CMT at baseline was 668.32±254.66 and 434.43±99.55, 243.22±58.92, and 220.83±42.60 at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months respectively. Baseline IOP measured was 16.5±3.1 mmHg which progressed to 19.6±3.4mmHg and 21.4±2.8mmHg at 6 weeks and 3 months respectively and decreased to 17.3±2.2 at 6 months. The most common adverse effect seen was increase in IOP in 24(48%)patients, out of which 3(6%) patients needed to start anti-glaucoma medication (AGM). 3(6%) patients had sub-conjunctival hemorrhage(SCH). Conclusion: The prolonged therapeutic effects of combination therapy leads to outstanding anatomical and visual outcome in non resolving ME due to BRVO, with fewer doses and thus fewer adverse effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document