scholarly journals Is reflection like soap? a critical narrative umbrella review of approaches to reflection in medical education research

Author(s):  
Sven P. C. Schaepkens ◽  
M. Veen ◽  
A. de la Croix

AbstractReflection is a complex concept in medical education research. No consensus exists on what reflection exactly entails; thus far, cross-comparing empirical findings has not resulted in definite evidence on how to foster reflection. The concept is as slippery as soap. This leaves the research field with the question, ‘how can research approach the conceptual indeterminacy of reflection to produce knowledge?’. The authors conducted a critical narrative umbrella review of research on reflection in medical education. Forty-seven review studies on reflection research from 2000 onwards were reviewed. The authors used the foundational literature on reflection from Dewey and Schön as an analytical lens to identify and critically juxtapose common approaches in reflection research that tackle the conceptual complexity. Research on reflection must deal with the paradox that every conceptualization of reflection is either too sharp or too broad because it is entrenched in practice. The key to conceptualizing reflection lies in its use and purpose, which can be provided by in situ research of reflective practices.

Author(s):  
Mathieu Albert ◽  
Paula Rowland ◽  
Farah Friesen ◽  
Suzanne Laberge

Abstract Introduction The medical education research field operates at the crossroads of two distinct academic worlds: higher education and medicine. As such, this field provides a unique opportunity to explore new forms of cross-disciplinary knowledge exchange. Methods Cross-disciplinary knowledge flow in medical education research was examined by looking at citation patterns in the five journals with the highest impact factor in 2017. To grasp the specificities of the knowledge flow in medical education, the field of higher education was used as a comparator. In total, 2031 citations from 64 medical education and 41 higher education articles published in 2017 were examined. Results Medical education researchers draw on a narrower range of knowledge communities than their peers in higher education. Medical education researchers predominantly cite articles published in health and medical education journals (80% of all citations), and to a lesser extent, articles published in education and social science journals. In higher education, while the largest share of the cited literature is internal to the domain (36%), researchers cite literature from across the social science spectrum. Findings suggest that higher education scholars engage in conversations with academics from a broader range of communities and perspectives than their medical education colleagues. Discussion Using Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of doxa and field, it is argued that the variety of epistemic cultures entering the higher education research space contributes to its interdisciplinary nature. Conversely, the existence of a relatively homogeneous epistemic culture in medicine potentially impedes cross-disciplinary knowledge exchange.


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 1318-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E. Farrell ◽  
Wendy C. Coates ◽  
Gloria J. Khun ◽  
Jonathan Fisher ◽  
Philip Shayne ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayra Cristancho ◽  
Emily Field ◽  
Lorelei Lingard

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 783-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Tackett ◽  
Scott M. Wright ◽  
Mark Quirk

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debbie Jaarsma ◽  
Albert Scherpbier ◽  
Cees Van Der Vleuten ◽  
Olle Ten Cate

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document