Genetic Variance–covariance Matrices: A Critique of the Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics Research Program

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Pigliucci
2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (33) ◽  
pp. 9262-9267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslea J. Hlusko ◽  
Christopher A. Schmitt ◽  
Tesla A. Monson ◽  
Marianne F. Brasil ◽  
Michael C. Mahaney

Developmental genetics research on mice provides a relatively sound understanding of the genes necessary and sufficient to make mammalian teeth. However, mouse dentitions are highly derived compared with human dentitions, complicating the application of these insights to human biology. We used quantitative genetic analyses of data from living nonhuman primates and extensive osteological and paleontological collections to refine our assessment of dental phenotypes so that they better represent how the underlying genetic mechanisms actually influence anatomical variation. We identify ratios that better characterize the output of two dental genetic patterning mechanisms for primate dentitions. These two newly defined phenotypes are heritable with no measurable pleiotropic effects. When we consider how these two phenotypes vary across neontological and paleontological datasets, we find that the major Middle Miocene taxonomic shift in primate diversity is characterized by a shift in these two genetic outputs. Our results build on the mouse model by combining quantitative genetics and paleontology, and thereby elucidate how genetic mechanisms likely underlie major events in primate evolution.


Evolution ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 1506-1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick C. Phillips ◽  
Stevan J. Arnold

Evolution ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 1506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick C. Phillips ◽  
Stevan J. Arnold

Genetics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 165 (1) ◽  
pp. 411-425
Author(s):  
Jason G Mezey ◽  
David Houle

Abstract Common principal components (CPC) analysis is a technique for assessing whether variance-covariance matrices from different populations have similar structure. One potential application is to compare additive genetic variance-covariance matrices, G. In this article, the conditions under which G matrices are expected to have common PCs are derived for a two-locus, two-allele model and the model of constrained pleiotropy. The theory demonstrates that whether G matrices are expected to have common PCs is largely determined by whether pleiotropic effects have a modular organization. If two (or more) populations have modules and these modules have the same direction, the G matrices have a common PC, regardless of allele frequencies. In the absence of modules, common PCs exist only for very restricted combinations of allele frequencies. Together, these two results imply that, when populations are evolving, common PCs are expected only when the populations have modules in common. These results have two implications: (1) In general, G matrices will not have common PCs, and (2) when they do, these PCs indicate common modular organization. The interpretation of common PCs identified for estimates of G matrices is discussed in light of these results.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg M. Walter ◽  
Delia Terranova ◽  
James Clark ◽  
Salvatore Cozzolino ◽  
Antonia Cristaudo ◽  
...  

AbstractGenetic correlations between traits are expected to constrain the rate of adaptation by concentrating genetic variation in certain phenotypic directions, which are unlikely to align with the direction of selection in novel environments. However, if genotypes vary in their response to novel environments, then plasticity could create changes in genetic variation that will determine whether genetic constraints to adaptation arise. We tested this hypothesis by mating two species of closely related, but ecologically distinct, Sicilian daisies (Senecio, Asteraceae) using a quantitative genetics breeding design. We planted seeds of both species across an elevational gradient that included the native habitat of each species and two intermediate elevations, and measured eight leaf morphology and physiology traits on established seedlings. We detected large significant changes in genetic variance across elevation and between species. Elevational changes in genetic variance within species were greater than differences between the two species. Furthermore, changes in genetic variation across elevation aligned with phenotypic plasticity. These results suggest that to understand adaptation to novel environments we need to consider how genetic variance changes in response to environmental variation, and the effect of such changes on genetic constraints to adaptation and the evolution of plasticity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document