Follow-Up Care After Behavioral Health-Related Hospitalization for Children and Adolescents

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1419-1428
Author(s):  
Sean Lynch ◽  
Whitney Witt ◽  
Mir M. Ali ◽  
Judith Teich ◽  
Ryan Mutter ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 627-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Lynch ◽  
Whitney Witt ◽  
Mir M. Ali ◽  
Judith Teich ◽  
Ryan Mutter ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31) ◽  
pp. 3964-3970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj K. Arora ◽  
Roxanne E. Jensen ◽  
Nadiyah Sulayman ◽  
Ann S. Hamilton ◽  
Arnold L. Potosky

Purpose To investigate non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors' willingness to discuss health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) problems with their follow-up care physician. Patients and Methods Willingness to discuss HRQOL problems (physical, daily, emotional, social, and sexual functioning) was examined among 374 NHL survivors, 2 to 5 years postdiagnosis. Survivors were asked if they would bring up HRQOL problems with their physician and indicate reasons why not. Logistic regression models examined the association of patient sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, follow-up care variables, and current HRQOL scores with willingness to discuss HRQOL problems. Results Overall, 94%, 82%, 76%, 43%, and 49% of survivors would initiate discussions of physical, daily, emotional, social, and sexual functioning, respectively. Survivors who indicated their physician “always” spent enough time with them or rated their care as “excellent” were more willing to discuss HRQOL problems (P < .05). Survivors reporting poorer physical health were less willing to discuss their daily functioning problems (P < .001). Men were more willing to discuss sexual problems than women (P < .001). One in three survivors cited “nothing can be done” as a reason for not discussing daily functioning problems, and at least one in four cited “this was not their doctor's job” and a preference to “talk to another clinician” as reasons for not discussing emotional, social, and sexual functioning. Conclusion NHL survivors' willingness to raise HRQOL problems with their physician varied by HRQOL domain. For some domains, even when survivors were experiencing problems, they may not discuss them. To deliver cancer care for the whole patient, interventions that facilitate survivor-clinician communication about survivors' HRQOL are needed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang-Shan Huang ◽  
Shu-Ting Huang ◽  
Kai-Peng Sun ◽  
Zhi-Nuan Hong ◽  
Liang-Wan Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To investigate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents who underwent intraoperative device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSDs). Methods From October 2017 to January 2018, a total of 126 children and adolescents with isolated pmVSDs who underwent intraoperative device closure were enrolled in this study. We used the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Measurement Models 4.0 generic core scales to measure HRQOL 24 h before the operation and three months and one year after surgery. Results A total of 126 patients were successfully occluded. No severe complications occurred during the operative time, and 1 case of Mobitz type I atrioventricular block (AVB) and 1 case of complete cAVB occurred during the postoperative period. Compared with the data before the operation, the total score and five domain scores, including physical, psychosocial, emotional, social and psychological functioning, were significantly higher at three months after the operation. In addition, the total score, physical functioning score, and the psychosocial functioning score at the 1-year follow-up were even higher than those at 3 months after the operation. Conclusions The present study suggests that intraoperative device closure of pmVSD could improve health-related quality of life in children/adolescents and that the improvement may progress as the time after the operation increases. Further studies should concentrate on comparisons with other medical methods, larger samples, and longer follow-up periods.


Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Javan Chan ◽  
Stephanie Buhagiar ◽  
Laisa Teleni ◽  
Camilla Simonsen ◽  
Jane Turner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Survival rates for lymphoma are highest amongst hematological malignancies. In 2019, it was estimated that over 6400 Australians were diagnosed with lymphoma, a group of hematological malignancies with a high 5-year survival rate of ~ 76%. There is an increased focus on the promotion of wellness in survivorship and active approaches to reducing morbidity related to treatment; however, current models of follow-up care heavily rely on hospital-based specialist-led care. Maximizing the potential of general practitioners (GPs) in the ongoing management of cancer is consistent with the national health reform principles and the Cancer Council Australia’s Optimal Care Pathways. GPs are well positioned to provide guideline-based follow-up care and are more likely to address comorbidities and psychosocial issues and promote healthy lifestyle behaviors. This study aims to test the feasibility of the GOSPEL I intervention for implementing an integrated, shared care model in which cancer center specialists and community-based GPs collaborate to provide survivorship care for patients with lymphoma. Methods We describe a protocol for a phase II, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation. Sixty patients with Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma will be randomized to usual specialist-led follow-up care (as determined by the treating hematologists) or a shared follow-up care intervention (i.e., GOSPEL I). GOSPEL I is a nurse-enabled, pre-specified shared care pathway with follow-up responsibilities shared between cancer center specialists (i.e., hematologists and specialist cancer nurses) and GPs. Outcome measures assess feasibility as well as a range of patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Lymphoma, patient experience of care, symptom distress, comorbidity burden, dietary intake, physical activity behaviors, financial distress/interference, and satisfaction of care. Safety indicators including hospital admission and unscheduled lymphoma clinic visits as well as process outcomes such as intervention fidelity and economic indicators will be analyzed. Discussion This trial is designed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a new model of shared care for lymphoma survivors. Patient-reported outcomes as well as potential barriers to implementation will be analyzed to inform a larger definitive clinical trial testing the effects and implementation of a shared care model on health-related quality of life of lymphoma survivors. Trial registration Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000594921. Registered on 22 May 2020.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Chan ◽  
Stephanie Buhagiar ◽  
Laisa Teleni ◽  
Camilla Simonsen ◽  
Jane Turner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Survival rates for lymphoma are highest amongst hematological malignancies. In 2019, it was estimated that over 6,400 Australians were diagnosed with lymphoma, a group of hematological malignancies with a high 5-year survival rate of ~76%. There is an increased focus on the promotion of wellness in survivorship and active approaches to reducing morbidity related to treatment; however, current models of follow-up care heavily rely on hospital-based specialist-led care.Maximizing the potential of general practitioners (GPs) in the ongoing management of cancer is consistent with the national health reform principles, and the Cancer Council Australia’s Optimal Care Pathways. GPs are well positioned to provide guideline-based follow-up care and are more likely to address comorbidities, psychosocial issues and promote healthy lifestyle behaviors. This study aims to test the feasibility of the GOSPEL 1 intervention for implementing an integrated, shared-care model in which cancer center specialists and community-based GPs collaborate to provide survivorship care for patients with lymphoma.Methods: We describe a protocol for a phase II, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation. Sixty patients with Hodgkin’s and Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma will be randomized to usual specialist-led follow-up care (as determined by the treating hematologists) or a shared follow-up care intervention (i.e., GOSPEL 1). GOSPEL 1 is a nurse-enabled, pre-specified shared-care pathway with follow-up responsibilities shared between cancer center specialists (i.e., hematologists and specialist cancer nurses) and GPs. Outcome measures assess feasibility as well as a range of patient reported outcomes including health-related quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Lymphoma, patient experience of care, symptom distress, comorbidity burden, dietary intake, physical activity behaviors, financial distress/interference and satisfaction of care. Safety indicators including hospital admission and unscheduled lymphoma clinic visits as well as process outcomes such as intervention fidelity and economic indicators will be analyzed.Discussion: This trial is designed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a new model of shared-care for lymphoma survivors. Patient reported outcomes as well as potential barriers to implementation will be also analyzed to inform a larger definitive clinical trial testing the effects of a shared-care model on health-related quality of life of lymphoma survivors.Trial registration: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Registration number: ACTRN12620000594921, Date registered: 22/05/2020, registration link: https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12620000594921.aspx


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S123-S123
Author(s):  
Kerry Mikolaj ◽  
Trudy Boulter ◽  
Brad Jackson ◽  
Tim Schuetz

Abstract Introduction The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) is a tool used to measure health-related quality of life in children and adolescents. The PedsQL measures physical, emotional, social, and academic function. Our burn camp program provides comprehensive programming in a supportive, challenging environment to enhance care of a child with a burn injury. Our camp addresses: isolation, social skill development, body image, negative beliefs, risk-taking, and academic challenges. The lessons learned at camp are unique and build lifelong success. The PedsQL will provide data on changes that are being made with our campers over time. We hypothesize positive changes in PedsQL scores with the addition of burn camp. Methods The PedsQL consists of forms for children ages 2–4, 5–7, 8–12, and 13–18. Pediatric self-report is measured in children and adolescents ages 5–18. There is a separate parent proxy-report of the child’s health-related quality of life for ages 2–18. Before camp begins, parents are mailed the parent report to fill out and are due back prior to the first day of camp. Campers fill out the form on the first day of camp. Data is entered into an excel spreadsheet. Follow up parent and child/adolescent surveys are then sent out 3 months post camp. Three month follow up data is entered and compared to original scores. Three scores are generated from the data including total score, psychosocial score, and physical health score. A higher score indicates a better Health-Related Quality of Life. Results We trialed the use of the PedsQL in our adolescent burn camp, consisting of 23 campers ages 13–18. We received 8 (34%) follow up surveys. The results of these scores are trending in a positive direction. We used the PedsQL for our burn camp program consisting of 77 campers ages 8–18. We will obtain 3 month follow up data by Dec 2019 and will assess the data and report the changes. Conclusions The PedsQL is a tool that can help our camp program track changes/progress in our campers in the areas listed above. We have seen positive changes in our small sample size and predict we will see positive changes with our larger camp population in the next few months. Applicability of Research to Practice Using outcome measures for medical specialty camps is necessary and currently lacking in the literature. The PedsQL tool is used in healthy, acute and chronic health conditions, making it applicable for burn camp programs. The PedsQL has established norms for the healthy population for benchmarking purposes and community health comparisons. This tool will help our burn camp program assess the psychosocial, physical and academic growth of our campers.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1207-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Palacio-Vieira ◽  
E. Villalonga-Olives ◽  
J. M. Valderas ◽  
M. Espallargues ◽  
M. Herdman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document