Gauging the environmental efficiency with ecological compensation in presence of missing data using data envelopment analysis

Author(s):  
Junran Dong ◽  
Desheng Wu ◽  
Jingxiu Song ◽  
Jie Lu
2021 ◽  
pp. 173-192
Author(s):  
Rildo Vieira de Araújo ◽  
Robert Armando Espejo ◽  
Michel Constantino ◽  
Paula Martin de Moraes ◽  
Romildo Camargo Martins ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Richard Mulwa

Nitrogen, phosphate, and herbicide use are three main environmental problems caused by agriculture. Modelling these undesirable outputs and other detrimental side effects of production activities has attracted considerable attention and debate among production economists. A common approach is to treat detrimental variables as inputs mainly using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), which has enjoyed a lot of success over the years. On the other hand, Free Disposable Hull (FDH) has not enjoyed as much success as its counterpart, DEA. This chapter demonstrates how environmental efficiency can be modelled using both DEA and FDH under strong and weak disposability assumptions. Results show that weak disposability assumption is more superior in achieving relatively high emission reductions and that FDH tends to allocate efficiency to more DMUs compared to DEA.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Shero ◽  
Sara Ann Hart

Using methods like linear regression or latent variable models, researchers are often interested in maximizing explained variance and identifying the importance of specific variables within their models. These models are useful for understanding general ideas and trends, but often give limited insight into the individuals within said models. Data envelopment analysis (DEA), is a method with roots in organizational management that make such insights possible. Unlike models mentioned above, DEA does not explain variance. Instead, it explains how efficiently an individual utilizes their inputs to produce outputs, and identifies which input is not being utilized optimally. This paper provides readers with a brief history and past usages of DEA from organizational management, public health, and educational administration fields, while also describing the underlying math and processes behind said model. This paper then extends the usage of this method into the psychology field using two separate studies. First, using data from the Project KIDS dataset, DEA is demonstrated using a simple view of reading framework identifying individual efficiency levels in using reading-based skills to achieve reading comprehension, determining which skills are being underutilized, and classifying and comparing new subsets of readers. Three new subsets of readers were identified using this method, with direct implications leading to more targeted interventions. Second, DEA was used to measure individuals’ efficiency in regulating aggressive behavior given specific personality traits or related skills. This study found that despite comparable levels of component skills and personality traits, significant differences were found in efficiency to regulate aggressive behavior on the basis of gender and feelings of provocation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document